TGB vs. NVDA
TGB (Taseko Mines Limited) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. TGB operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, TGB returned 30.44%/yr vs 69.25%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGB vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 34.81% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 17.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 30.44%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.25% annualized return.
TGB
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 11.55%
- YTD
- 34.81%
- 6M
- 42.62%
- 1Y
- 208.91%
- 3Y*
- 75.98%
- 5Y*
- 25.61%
- 10Y*
- 30.44%
NVDA
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 54.29%
- 3Y*
- 77.51%
- 5Y*
- 65.68%
- 10Y*
- 69.25%
TGB vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 34.81% | 191.75% | 38.57% | -4.76% | -28.29% | 55.30% | 175.00% | 1.48% | -79.70% | 173.38% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 17.39% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGB and NVDA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 1999 | 0.19 |
The correlation between TGB and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TGB:
$2.81B
NVDA:
$5.33T
TGB:
$0.05
NVDA:
$6.53
TGB:
168.13
NVDA:
33.51
TGB:
25.19
NVDA:
0.18
TGB:
3.36
NVDA:
21.10
TGB:
3.43
NVDA:
27.28
TGB:
$768.31M
NVDA:
$253.49B
TGB:
$240.15M
NVDA:
$187.95B
TGB:
$244.74M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGB vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
TGB
NVDA
TGB vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.27 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.93 | 2.70 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 6.62 | +9.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | 1.60 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 1.28 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 1.40 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.63 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
TGB vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -89.72% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.47% | -20.21% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.26% | -36.88% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.70% | -66.34% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.76% | -66.34% | -24.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.51% | -7.14% | -37.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.38% | -36.20% | -45.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.89% | 8.23% | +4.66% |
Volatility
TGB vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 22.39% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.39% | 12.53% | +9.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.11% | 25.59% | +23.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.07% | 34.16% | +30.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.52% | 51.67% | +10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.64% | 49.80% | +15.84% |
Dividends
TGB vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TGB vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taseko Mines Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TGB vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
TGB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 81.37M and revenue of 234.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
TGB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 66.76M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
TGB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 16.89M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TGB and NVDA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGB has higher volatility (22.39%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGB and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer