PortfoliosLab logo
TGB vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and NVDA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TGB vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TGB:

-0.34

NVDA:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

TGB:

-0.22

NVDA:

0.84

Omega Ratio

TGB:

0.97

NVDA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

TGB:

-0.28

NVDA:

0.51

Martin Ratio

TGB:

-1.03

NVDA:

1.24

Ulcer Index

TGB:

23.67%

NVDA:

15.09%

Daily Std Dev

TGB:

61.25%

NVDA:

58.96%

Max Drawdown

TGB:

-98.58%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

TGB:

-83.78%

NVDA:

-9.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TGB:

$704.40M

NVDA:

$3.39T

EPS

TGB:

-$0.15

NVDA:

$3.10

PEG Ratio

TGB:

0.00

NVDA:

1.93

PS Ratio

TGB:

1.17

NVDA:

22.86

PB Ratio

TGB:

1.95

NVDA:

41.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

TGB:

$600.30M

NVDA:

$148.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TGB:

$109.10M

NVDA:

$104.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

TGB:

$97.43M

NVDA:

$90.97B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 13.49%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 74.01% annualized return.


TGB

YTD

14.95%

1M

-2.19%

6M

8.25%

1Y

-20.64%

3Y*

11.94%

5Y*

41.22%

10Y*

13.49%

NVDA

YTD

0.63%

1M

24.06%

6M

-2.24%

1Y

22.32%

3Y*

93.53%

5Y*

72.51%

10Y*

74.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Taseko Mines Limited

NVIDIA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TGB vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TGB is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TGB is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TGB is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TGB is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TGB is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TGB is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TGB vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TGB vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

TGB vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and NVDA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TGB vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 16.74% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.81%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TGB vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taseko Mines Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
139.15M
44.06B
(TGB) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TGB vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taseko Mines Limited and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
11.8%
60.5%
(TGB) Gross Margin
(NVDA) Gross Margin
TGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 16.37M and revenue of 139.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.8%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.67B and revenue of 44.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.5%.

TGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 6.87M and revenue of 139.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 21.64B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.

TGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of -28.56M and revenue of 139.15M, resulting in a net margin of -20.5%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 18.78B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.