PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGB vs. UEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TGB vs. UEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 37.46% return, which is significantly higher than UEC's 20.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TGB having a 31.34% annualized return and UEC not far behind at 31.30%.


TGB

1D
-6.27%
1M
13.58%
YTD
37.46%
6M
48.19%
1Y
225.52%
3Y*
77.13%
5Y*
26.10%
10Y*
31.34%

UEC

1D
-8.74%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
20.63%
6M
8.80%
1Y
121.54%
3Y*
66.37%
5Y*
33.60%
10Y*
31.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGB vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
37.46%191.75%38.57%-4.76%-28.29%55.30%175.00%1.48%-79.70%173.38%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
20.63%74.59%4.53%64.95%15.82%90.34%91.47%-26.46%-29.38%58.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and UEC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2007

0.31

The correlation between TGB and UEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TGB:

$2.87B

UEC:

$6.82B

EPS

TGB:

$0.05

UEC:

-$0.18

PS Ratio

TGB:

3.43

UEC:

324.99

PB Ratio

TGB:

3.50

UEC:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

TGB:

$768.31M

UEC:

$20.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TGB:

$240.15M

UEC:

$5.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

TGB:

$244.74M

UEC:

-$104.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGB vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGB
TGB Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGB vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGBUECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.40

2.99

+3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.62

5.98

+11.64

TGB vs. UEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the UEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and UEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGBUECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49

1.62

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.46

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.43

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.05

-0.06

Drawdowns

TGB vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and UEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGBUECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.58%

-97.40%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.47%

-40.86%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.26%

-53.49%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.70%

-63.76%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.76%

-80.59%

-10.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.42%

-30.04%

-13.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.39%

-62.12%

-19.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.86%

20.41%

-7.55%

Volatility

TGB vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) is 22.25%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 27.23%. This indicates that TGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGBUECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.25%

27.23%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.10%

57.08%

-7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.04%

76.21%

-11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.53%

74.08%

-11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.65%

73.87%

-8.22%

Dividends

TGB vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither TGB nor UEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TGB vs. UEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taseko Mines Limited and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
234.55M
20.20M
(TGB) Total Revenue
(UEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TGB and UEC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEC has higher volatility (27.23%) compared to TGB (22.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs UEC's -97.40%.

TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGB and UEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer