TGB vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.49%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and QQQ.

Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 16.74% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.62%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.