TGB vs. FSLR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR).

Performance

TGB vs. FSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TGB vs. FSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	19.61%	191.75%	38.57%	-4.76%	-28.29%	55.30%	175.00%	1.48%	-79.70%	173.38%
FSLR First Solar, Inc.	-23.66%	48.22%	2.30%	15.01%	71.86%	-11.89%	76.77%	31.81%	-37.12%	110.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TGB : $2.37B FSLR : $21.47B
EPS TGB : -$0.09 FSLR : $14.21
PS Ratio TGB : 3.31 FSLR : 4.11
PB Ratio TGB : 3.05 FSLR : 2.25
Total Revenue (TTM) TGB : $672.90M FSLR : $5.22B
Gross Profit (TTM) TGB : $175.15M FSLR : $2.12B
EBITDA (TTM) TGB : $159.70M FSLR : $2.00B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 19.61% return, which is significantly higher than FSLR's -23.66% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has outperformed FSLR with an annualized return of 28.81%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.44% annualized return.

TGB

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: -22.72%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 61.58%
• 1Y: 195.63%
• 3Y*: 59.77%
• 5Y*: 30.19%
• 10Y*: 28.81%

FSLR

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: -23.66%
• 6M: -11.30%
• 1Y: 56.32%
• 3Y*: -2.85%
• 5Y*: 18.28%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TGB vs. FSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGB

TGB Risk / Return Rank: 94
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FSLR

FSLR Risk / Return Rank: 70
FSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGB vs. FSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGB	FSLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	0.89	+2.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	1.59	+1.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.21	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.70	1.64	+4.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.80	3.99	+13.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGB vs. FSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the FSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and FSLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGB	FSLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	0.89	+2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.34	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.23	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.19	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and FSLR is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TGB vs. FSLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TGB nor FSLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TGB vs. FSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and FSLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGB	FSLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.58%	-96.22%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.47%	-35.10%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.27%	-59.97%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.76%	-61.26%	-29.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.76%	-35.91%	-14.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.57%	-63.59%	-17.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.36%	14.46%	-3.10%

Volatility

TGB vs. FSLR - Volatility Comparison

Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 21.59% compared to First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) at 11.39%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGB	FSLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.59%	11.39%	+10.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.36%	39.08%	+10.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.40%	63.72%	+2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.65%	53.41%	+9.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.92%	50.35%	+15.57%

Financials

TGB vs. FSLR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taseko Mines Limited and First Solar, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 124.06M and revenue of 243.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

FSLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 665.34M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.

TGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 111.93M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

FSLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported an operating income of 547.92M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.

TGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 4.45M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

FSLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a net income of 520.88M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.