TGB vs. INUV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV).

Performance

TGB vs. INUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TGB vs. INUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	19.61%	191.75%	38.57%	-4.76%	-28.29%	55.30%	175.00%	1.48%	-79.70%	173.38%
INUV Inuvo, Inc.	-13.71%	-61.63%	52.09%	91.87%	-58.21%	17.02%	50.97%	-71.96%	32.10%	-51.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TGB : $2.37B INUV : $31.30M
EPS TGB : -$0.09 INUV : -$0.35
PS Ratio TGB : 3.31 INUV : 0.36
PB Ratio TGB : 3.05 INUV : 3.12
Total Revenue (TTM) TGB : $672.90M INUV : $86.21M
Gross Profit (TTM) TGB : $175.15M INUV : $64.21M
EBITDA (TTM) TGB : $159.70M INUV : -$5.57M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 19.61% return, which is significantly higher than INUV's -13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has outperformed INUV with an annualized return of 28.81%, while INUV has yielded a comparatively lower -19.62% annualized return.

TGB

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: -22.72%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 61.58%
• 1Y: 195.63%
• 3Y*: 59.77%
• 5Y*: 30.19%
• 10Y*: 28.81%

INUV

• 1D: 3.38%
• 1M: -32.92%
• YTD: -13.71%
• 6M: -38.68%
• 1Y: -41.37%
• 3Y*: -9.81%
• 5Y*: -26.83%
• 10Y*: -19.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TGB vs. INUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGB

TGB Risk / Return Rank: 94
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

INUV

INUV Risk / Return Rank: 24
INUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
INUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
INUV Omega Ratio Rank: 28
INUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
INUV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGB vs. INUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGB	INUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	-0.42	+3.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	-0.05	+3.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	0.99	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.70	-0.55	+6.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.80	-0.93	+18.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGB vs. INUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the INUV Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and INUV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGB	INUV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	-0.42	+3.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	-0.31	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	-0.16	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	-0.08	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and INUV is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TGB vs. INUV - Dividend Comparison

Neither TGB nor INUV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TGB vs. INUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum INUV drawdown of -99.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and INUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGB	INUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.58%	-99.73%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.47%	-71.60%	+36.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.27%	-84.25%	+18.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.76%	-91.65%	+0.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.76%	-99.65%	+48.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.57%	-82.94%	+1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.36%	42.86%	-31.50%

Volatility

TGB vs. INUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) is 21.59%, while Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) has a volatility of 23.08%. This indicates that TGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGB	INUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.59%	23.08%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.36%	77.72%	-28.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.40%	98.24%	-31.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.65%	86.67%	-24.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.92%	121.70%	-55.78%

Financials

TGB vs. INUV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taseko Mines Limited and Inuvo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 124.06M and revenue of 243.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

INUV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 9.46M and revenue of 14.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

TGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 111.93M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

INUV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.21M and revenue of 14.26M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.5%.

TGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 4.45M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

INUV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a net income of -593.87K and revenue of 14.26M, resulting in a net margin of -4.2%.