PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGB vs. INUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TGB vs. INUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 38.34% return, which is significantly higher than INUV's -56.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has outperformed INUV with an annualized return of 31.03%, while INUV has yielded a comparatively lower -21.52% annualized return.


TGB

1D
12.34%
1M
12.99%
6M
-11.33%
YTD
38.34%
1Y
153.40%
3Y*
78.36%
5Y*
33.89%
10Y*
31.03%
ALL TIME*
-1.35%

INUV

1D
13.67%
1M
1.87%
6M
-39.78%
YTD
-56.05%
1Y
-78.42%
3Y*
-22.77%
5Y*
-33.53%
10Y*
-21.52%
ALL TIME*
-12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$310.28K$386.35K$322.99K
$49.74M$40.96M$38.39M

TGB vs. INUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
38.34%191.75%38.57%-4.76%-28.29%55.30%175.00%1.48%-79.70%173.38%
INUV
Inuvo, Inc.
-56.05%-61.63%52.09%91.87%-58.21%17.02%50.97%-71.96%32.10%-51.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and INUV is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 1998

0.07

Over the past year, TGB and INUV have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TGB:

$2.86B

INUV:

$17.93M

EPS

TGB:

CA$0.04

INUV:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

TGB:

4.94

INUV:

0.24

PB Ratio

TGB:

4.94

INUV:

1.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

TGB:

CA$768.31M

INUV:

$67.43M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TGB:

CA$240.15M

INUV:

$46.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

TGB:

CA$244.74M

INUV:

-$3.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGB vs. INUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGB
TGB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

INUV
INUV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
INUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
INUV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INUV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGB vs. INUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Inuvo, Inc. (INUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGBINUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.82

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

-0.95

+5.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

-1.37

+11.76

TGB vs. INUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the INUV Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and INUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGB vs. INUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum INUV drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and INUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGBINUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.58%

-99.85%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.47%

-83.12%

+47.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.26%

-87.13%

+42.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.92%

-89.14%

+27.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.76%

-95.38%

+4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.05%

-99.82%

+56.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.21%

-83.13%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.82%

57.37%

-42.55%

Volatility

TGB vs. INUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) is 28.03%, while Inuvo, Inc. (INUV) has a volatility of 29.73%. This indicates that TGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGBINUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.03%

29.73%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.62%

67.36%

-11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.69%

97.68%

-28.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.64%

86.94%

-23.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.24%

122.20%

-55.96%

Dividends

TGB vs. INUV - Dividend Comparison

Neither TGB nor INUV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TGB vs. INUV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taseko Mines Limited and Inuvo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

TGB vs. INUV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taseko Mines Limited and Inuvo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

TGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 81.37M and revenue of 234.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.

INUV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.66M and revenue of 7.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.

TGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 66.76M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

INUV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.88M and revenue of 7.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -49.0%.

TGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 16.89M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

INUV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Inuvo, Inc. reported a net income of 1.90M and revenue of 7.93M, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TGB and INUV have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INUV has higher volatility (29.73%) compared to TGB (28.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs INUV's -99.85%.

TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGB and INUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer