TGB vs. RYCEY
TGB (Taseko Mines Limited) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. TGB operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TGB returned 30.44%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGB vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 34.81% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 30.44%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.
TGB
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 11.55%
- YTD
- 34.81%
- 6M
- 42.62%
- 1Y
- 208.91%
- 3Y*
- 75.98%
- 5Y*
- 25.61%
- 10Y*
- 30.44%
RYCEY
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 40.77%
- 3Y*
- 112.66%
- 5Y*
- 62.45%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
TGB vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 34.81% | 191.75% | 38.57% | -4.76% | -28.29% | 55.30% | 175.00% | 1.48% | -79.70% | 173.38% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 8.80% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGB and RYCEY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2014 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
TGB:
$2.81B
RYCEY:
$143.10B
TGB:
$0.05
RYCEY:
$0.99
TGB:
168.13
RYCEY:
17.20
TGB:
25.19
RYCEY:
0.04
TGB:
3.36
RYCEY:
3.59
TGB:
3.43
RYCEY:
52.59
TGB:
$768.31M
RYCEY:
$40.04B
TGB:
$240.15M
RYCEY:
$10.10B
TGB:
$244.74M
RYCEY:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGB vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
TGB
RYCEY
TGB vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGB | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.21 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.93 | 1.88 | +4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 5.38 | +10.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGB | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23 | 1.09 | +2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 1.44 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.16 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | -0.23 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
TGB vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGB | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -99.07% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.47% | -21.75% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.26% | -23.37% | -20.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.70% | -62.01% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.76% | -94.64% | +3.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.51% | -78.40% | +33.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.38% | -84.19% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.89% | 7.61% | +5.28% |
Volatility
TGB vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 22.39% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 13.07%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGB | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.39% | 13.07% | +9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.11% | 32.78% | +16.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.07% | 37.69% | +27.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.52% | 43.52% | +19.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.64% | 49.33% | +16.31% |
Dividends
TGB vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.75% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TGB vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taseko Mines Limited and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TGB vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
TGB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 81.37M and revenue of 234.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
TGB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 66.76M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
TGB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 16.89M and revenue of 234.55M, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TGB and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGB has higher volatility (22.39%) compared to RYCEY (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGB and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer