PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCEY vs. SMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RYCEY vs. SMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Nuscale Power Corp (SMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -13.41% return.


RYCEY

1D
-1.69%
1M
4.65%
YTD
7.91%
6M
17.47%
1Y
38.93%
3Y*
110.91%
5Y*
62.18%
10Y*
7.64%

SMR

1D
-12.04%
1M
0.74%
YTD
-13.41%
6M
-39.08%
1Y
-61.40%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
7.91%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-12.71%
SMR
Nuscale Power Corp
-13.41%-20.97%444.98%-67.93%2.29%-0.89%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and SMR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RYCEY:

$141.92B

SMR:

$3.92B

EPS

RYCEY:

$0.99

SMR:

-$2.02

PS Ratio

RYCEY:

3.56

SMR:

129.54

PB Ratio

RYCEY:

52.15

SMR:

3.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

RYCEY:

$40.04B

SMR:

$18.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RYCEY:

$10.10B

SMR:

$4.45M

EBITDA (TTM)

RYCEY:

$8.04B

SMR:

-$696.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SMR
SMR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Nuscale Power Corp (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYCEYSMRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

-0.59

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

-0.61

+2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.94

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

-0.74

+2.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.14

-1.10

+6.24

RYCEY vs. SMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the SMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and SMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYCEYSMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

-0.59

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

0.05

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.04

-0.27

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than SMR's maximum drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and SMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCEYSMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-87.47%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-82.86%

+61.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-82.86%

+59.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-87.47%

+25.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.58%

-77.04%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.19%

-34.87%

-49.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

55.79%

-48.20%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) is 13.12%, while Nuscale Power Corp (SMR) has a volatility of 30.10%. This indicates that RYCEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCEYSMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.12%

30.10%

-16.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.77%

69.57%

-36.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.76%

103.97%

-66.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

93.22%

-49.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.34%

89.27%

-39.93%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.75%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%
SMR
Nuscale Power Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RYCEY vs. SMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Nuscale Power Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B202120222023202420252026
11.64B
0
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
(SMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCEY and SMR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMR has higher volatility (30.10%) compared to RYCEY (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs SMR's -87.47%.

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and SMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer