RYCEY vs. RR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L).
Performance
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | -1.91% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | -3.20% | 120.24% | 86.56% | 238.53% | -32.26% | 9.45% | -51.10% | -13.17% | -6.26% | 43.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
RYCEY is traded in USD, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
RYCEY:
$129.57B
RR.L:
£95.11B
RYCEY:
$0.99
RR.L:
£0.99
RYCEY:
15.57
RR.L:
11.42
RYCEY:
0.03
RR.L:
0.02
RYCEY:
3.25
RR.L:
2.38
RYCEY:
47.61
RR.L:
34.89
RYCEY:
$40.04B
RR.L:
£40.12B
RYCEY:
$10.10B
RR.L:
£10.12B
RYCEY:
$8.04B
RR.L:
£9.20B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly higher than RR.L's -3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 6.05%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.59% annualized return.
RYCEY
- 1D
- 5.83%
- 1M
- -17.19%
- YTD
- -1.91%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- 59.09%
- 3Y*
- 105.06%
- 5Y*
- 58.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.05%
RR.L
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -16.67%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- 56.77%
- 3Y*
- 102.10%
- 5Y*
- 58.71%
- 10Y*
- 17.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCEY vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank
RYCEY
RR.L
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYCEY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.64 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 2.13 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 2.53 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.86 | 8.69 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYCEY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.64 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.35 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.24 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCEY and RR.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison
RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than RR.L's 0.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.88% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 2.99% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
Drawdowns
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than RR.L's maximum drawdown of -91.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and RR.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCEY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -89.61% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.75% | -18.82% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.01% | -55.09% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.64% | -89.41% | -5.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.53% | -16.95% | -63.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.27% | -39.27% | -45.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 5.47% | +0.75% |
Volatility
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 17.32% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) at 15.32%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYCEY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.32% | 15.32% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.30% | 23.20% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.09% | 34.51% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.67% | 43.08% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.90% | 49.70% | -0.80% |
Financials
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RYCEY vs. RR.L - Profitability Comparison
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.