PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGB vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGB vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 0.52% return.


TGB

1D
-6.65%
1M
-4.12%
6M
2.06%
YTD
31.45%
1Y
111.97%
3Y*
71.69%
5Y*
33.57%
10Y*
28.23%

AGGH

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.31%
6M
-0.34%
YTD
0.52%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGB vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
31.45%191.75%38.57%-4.76%-24.62%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
0.52%8.23%1.97%8.47%-8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and AGGH is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGB vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGB
TGB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGB vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGBAGGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.85

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

7.70

+0.21

TGB vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGB vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGBAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.58%

-13.26%

-85.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.47%

-2.83%

-32.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.26%

-6.68%

-37.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.89%

-1.53%

-44.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.27%

-4.37%

-76.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.36%

1.05%

+13.31%

Volatility

TGB vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 23.52% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.39%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGBAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.52%

1.39%

+22.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.35%

3.50%

+51.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.76%

5.89%

+60.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.34%

8.38%

+54.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.05%

8.38%

+57.67%

Dividends

TGB vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.52%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGB and AGGH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGB has higher volatility (23.52%) compared to AGGH (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs AGGH's -13.26%.

TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGB and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer