PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGGH vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGGH vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGH achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return.


AGGH

1D
0.20%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.48%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.08%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.55%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGH vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
0.68%8.23%1.97%8.47%-8.77%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.19%1.31%5.65%-9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AGGH and AGG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.75

The correlation between AGGH and AGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGGH vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGH vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGGHAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.57

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

4.54

+1.84

AGGH vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGGH Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGH and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGGH vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGH drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGH and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGHAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-18.43%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-2.76%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

-6.11%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-1.93%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-2.71%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.96%

+0.14%

Volatility

AGGH vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.10%. This indicates that AGGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGHAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.10%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

2.83%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.79%

3.81%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

6.10%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

5.41%

+3.02%

AGGH vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGH has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGGH vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.51%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGGH and AGG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGGH has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to AGG (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGH dropped -13.26% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 3-year performance, AGGH leads with 4.68% vs 3.96% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AGGH has performed better with a 4.68% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.

AGGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 3.98% for AGG.

AGGH is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while AGG is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AGGH and 0.03% for AGG.

AGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGGH and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer