PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AGGH vs. MTBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AGGHMTBA
YTD Return6.23%4.46%
Daily Std Dev9.57%4.72%
Max Drawdown-13.26%-2.55%
Current Drawdown-0.27%-0.06%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between AGGH and MTBA is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AGGH vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AGGH achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's 4.46% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.83%
5.47%
AGGH
MTBA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGGH vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGH has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.


AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for AGGH: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for MTBA: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGGH vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGGH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 5.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.005.33
MTBA
Sharpe ratio
No data

AGGH vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

AGGH vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, more than MTBA's 4.33% yield.


TTM20232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
9.82%9.51%2.11%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
4.33%0.48%0.00%

Drawdowns

AGGH vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGH drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -2.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGH and MTBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.27%
-0.06%
AGGH
MTBA

Volatility

AGGH vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 0.58%. This indicates that AGGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.69%
0.58%
AGGH
MTBA