PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AGGH vs. MTBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGGH vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.35%
2.26%
AGGH
MTBA

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGH achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than MTBA's 1.93% return.


AGGH

YTD

1.48%

1M

0.05%

6M

3.35%

1Y

6.50%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

MTBA

YTD

1.93%

1M

-0.10%

6M

2.26%

1Y

4.59%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


AGGHMTBA
Sharpe Ratio0.721.02
Sortino Ratio1.071.46
Omega Ratio1.131.18
Calmar Ratio0.891.61
Martin Ratio2.703.89
Ulcer Index2.41%1.18%
Daily Std Dev9.07%4.49%
Max Drawdown-13.26%-2.84%
Current Drawdown-4.73%-2.48%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGGH vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGH has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.


AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for AGGH: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for MTBA: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between AGGH and MTBA is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGGH vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.721.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.071.46
The chart of Omega ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.131.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.191.61
The chart of Martin ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.703.89
AGGH
MTBA

The current AGGH Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGH and MTBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.700.800.901.001.101.201.301.40Sat 09Nov 10Mon 11Tue 12Wed 13Thu 14Fri 15Sat 16Nov 17Mon 18Tue 19Wed 20Thu 21Fri 22
0.72
1.02
AGGH
MTBA

Dividends

AGGH vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, more than MTBA's 5.47% yield.


TTM20232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
9.73%9.51%2.11%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
5.47%0.48%0.00%

Drawdowns

AGGH vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGH drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGH and MTBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.73%
-2.48%
AGGH
MTBA

Volatility

AGGH vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 1.16%. This indicates that AGGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.87%
1.16%
AGGH
MTBA