PortfoliosLab logo
AGGH vs. MTBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AGGH and MTBA is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

AGGH vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
11.28%
8.12%
AGGH
MTBA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AGGH:

0.80

MTBA:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

AGGH:

1.22

MTBA:

1.86

Omega Ratio

AGGH:

1.15

MTBA:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

AGGH:

0.97

MTBA:

1.58

Martin Ratio

AGGH:

2.48

MTBA:

3.84

Ulcer Index

AGGH:

2.86%

MTBA:

1.43%

Daily Std Dev

AGGH:

8.91%

MTBA:

4.25%

Max Drawdown

AGGH:

-13.26%

MTBA:

-3.48%

Current Drawdown

AGGH:

-0.74%

MTBA:

-0.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGH achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's 2.29% return.


AGGH

YTD

3.69%

1M

2.40%

6M

2.47%

1Y

6.43%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MTBA

YTD

2.29%

1M

1.79%

6M

1.06%

1Y

5.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGGH vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGH has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for AGGH: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for MTBA: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGGH vs. MTBA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGGH is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGGH is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGGH is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGGH is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGGH is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGGH is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MTBA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTBA is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTBA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTBA is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTBA is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTBA is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTBA is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AGGH vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.801.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.221.86
The chart of Omega ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.151.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.061.58
The chart of Martin ratio for AGGH, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.483.84
AGGH
MTBA

The current AGGH Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGH and MTBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.40Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16Feb 23Mar 02
0.80
1.29
AGGH
MTBA

Dividends

AGGH vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than MTBA's 5.96% yield.


TTM202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
8.09%8.97%9.51%2.11%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
5.96%6.03%0.48%0.00%

Drawdowns

AGGH vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGH drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGH and MTBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
-0.74%
-0.19%
AGGH
MTBA

Volatility

AGGH vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 0.95%. This indicates that AGGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
2.04%
0.95%
AGGH
MTBA