TEMR vs. TGRW

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEMR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.

Performance

TEMR vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEMR

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 1.80%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TGRW

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 1Y: 12.36%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMR vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	15.02%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	10.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMR and TGRW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.79

Return for Risk

TEMR vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TGRW

TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMR vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEMR	TGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.08	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.01	—

Drawdowns

TEMR vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and TGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMR	TGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.74%	-43.33%	+34.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.13%	-4.07%	-2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-12.35%	+9.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEMR	TGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.63%	17.54%	+16.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.63%	23.44%	+10.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.63%	23.01%	+10.62%

TEMR vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMR vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither TEMR nor TGRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.40%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMR and TGRW in my portfolio?

TEMR and TGRW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEMR or TGRW?

On fees, TEMR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMR or TGRW?

TEMR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMR or TGRW?

TEMR and TGRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TEMR and TGRW?

TEMR is categorized as Actively Managed, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.52% for TGRW.