TEMR vs. TGRW
TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TEMR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.
Performance
TEMR vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TEMR
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TGRW
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -3.33%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.08K | $37.97K | $35.36K | |
| $147.93K | $311.58K | $602.24K |
TEMR vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 4.99% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMR and TGRW is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMR vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank
TEMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TGRW
TEMR vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMR | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMR vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and TGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMR | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -43.33% | +29.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.32% | -10.86% | -3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -12.30% | +8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility
TEMR vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMR | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.01% | 18.05% | +14.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 23.48% | +9.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 22.98% | +10.03% |
TEMR vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMR vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison
Neither TEMR nor TGRW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMR and TGRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TEMR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEMR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
TEMR and TGRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TEMR is categorized as Actively Managed, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.52% for TGRW.
Find the right allocation for TEMR and TGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer