TEMR vs. BLST

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TEMR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.

Performance

TEMR vs. BLST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEMR

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: -9.70%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BLST

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 1Y: 2.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	$246.66K	$341.10K	$409.30K
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	$55.08K	$37.97K	$35.36K

TEMR vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	4.99%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMR and BLST is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.51

Return for Risk

TEMR vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEMR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 49
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEMR vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TEMR	BLST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.51	—

Drawdowns

TEMR vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and BLST.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMR	BLST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.32%	-1.69%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.32%	-0.94%	-13.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-0.41%	-3.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEMR	BLST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.01%	2.26%	+30.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.01%	2.26%	+30.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.01%	2.26%	+30.75%

TEMR vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMR vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison

TEMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%.

Position	TTM	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	4.05%	2.11%
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMR and BLST in my portfolio?

TEMR and BLST have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEMR or BLST?

On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMR or BLST?

BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMR or BLST?

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.00% for TEMR.

What is the main difference between TEMR and BLST?

TEMR is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.23% for BLST.