TEAF vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TEAF (Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TEAF charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

TEAF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEAF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 10.60%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 6M: 19.66%
• 1Y: 41.82%
• 3Y*: 28.78%
• 5Y*: 17.97%
• 10Y*: 21.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEAF vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund	0.00%	9.74%	12.16%	-0.64%	-5.41%	19.37%	-12.76%	-13.82%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	21.30%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	20.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TEAF and QQQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2019	0.33

The correlation between TEAF and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TEAF vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 73
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEAF	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.41	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TEAF	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-82.97%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.26%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.79%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEAF	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.94%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.38%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	22.29%	—

TEAF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEAF has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEAF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.38%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund	3.69%	7.37%	9.00%	9.22%	8.25%	6.18%	8.17%	5.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEAF and QQQ in my portfolio?

TEAF and QQQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.