PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEAF vs. STAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TEAF vs. STAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TEAF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STAG

1D
-0.05%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
0.43%
6M
-5.24%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEAF vs. STAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TEAF
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
0.00%9.74%12.16%-0.64%-5.41%19.37%-12.76%-13.82%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
0.43%13.30%-10.34%26.73%-29.66%59.10%4.18%11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TEAF and STAG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2019

0.33

The correlation between TEAF and STAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEAF:

$21.36M

STAG:

$863.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEAF:

$14.31M

STAG:

$356.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

TEAF:

-$435.19K

STAG:

$598.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEAF vs. STAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAF

STAG
STAG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
STAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
STAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAF vs. STAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TEAF vs. STAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEAFSTAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

Drawdowns

TEAF vs. STAG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEAFSTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

Volatility

TEAF vs. STAG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEAFSTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

Dividends

TEAF vs. STAG - Dividend Comparison

TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than STAG's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
3.44%4.05%4.38%3.74%4.52%3.02%4.60%4.53%5.71%5.14%5.82%7.40%
TEAF
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
3.69%7.37%9.00%9.22%8.25%6.18%8.17%5.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TEAF vs. STAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and STAG Industrial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
8.77M
224.21M
(TEAF) Total Revenue
(STAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TEAF and STAG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEAF and STAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer