TEAF vs. KYN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TEAF (Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund) is a stock, while KYN (Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund) is Energy Equities fund actively managed by Kayne Anderson. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TEAF charges 2.01%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for KYN.

Performance

TEAF vs. KYN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEAF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KYN

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 21.57%
• 3Y*: 30.67%
• 5Y*: 20.94%
• 10Y*: 6.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEAF vs. KYN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund	0.00%	9.74%	12.16%	-0.64%	-5.41%	19.37%	-12.76%	-13.82%
KYN Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund	16.76%	5.34%	60.45%	13.19%	20.50%	44.21%	-51.60%	-4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TEAF and KYN is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2019	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between TEAF and KYN has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) TEAF : $21.36M KYN : $133.71M
Gross Profit (TTM) TEAF : $14.31M KYN : $112.99M
EBITDA (TTM) TEAF : -$435.19K KYN : $863.04M

Return for Risk

TEAF vs. KYN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KYN

KYN Risk / Return Rank: 26
KYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
KYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
KYN Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
KYN Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAF vs. KYN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEAF	KYN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.16	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TEAF	KYN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-91.43%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.71%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-26.95%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEAF	KYN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	23.29%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	40.93%	—

TEAF vs. KYN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEAF has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than KYN's 2.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEAF vs. KYN - Dividend Comparison

TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than KYN's 7.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KYN Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund	7.03%	7.75%	8.34%	9.45%	9.05%	6.42%	16.17%	10.34%	14.17%	9.97%	11.24%	15.20%
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund	3.69%	7.37%	9.00%	9.22%	8.25%	6.18%	8.17%	5.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEAF and KYN in my portfolio?

TEAF and KYN have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.