TEAF vs. GBAB
Compare and contrast key facts about Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TEAF or GBAB.
Correlation
The correlation between TEAF and GBAB is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TEAF vs. GBAB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TEAF:
0.57
GBAB:
0.36
TEAF:
0.80
GBAB:
0.58
TEAF:
1.13
GBAB:
1.08
TEAF:
0.39
GBAB:
0.21
TEAF:
1.40
GBAB:
0.54
TEAF:
5.42%
GBAB:
9.13%
TEAF:
13.26%
GBAB:
13.72%
TEAF:
-62.12%
GBAB:
-35.81%
TEAF:
-12.64%
GBAB:
-18.52%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEAF achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly lower than GBAB's 1.99% return.
TEAF
-5.32%
-4.47%
-12.64%
7.01%
9.33%
N/A
GBAB
1.99%
-1.64%
-6.58%
4.53%
-0.02%
3.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TEAF vs. GBAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TEAF
GBAB
TEAF vs. GBAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TEAF vs. GBAB - Dividend Comparison
TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, less than GBAB's 10.06% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund | 9.72% | 9.00% | 9.22% | 8.25% | 6.18% | 8.17% | 5.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | 10.06% | 9.93% | 9.32% | 9.22% | 6.36% | 5.92% | 6.37% | 6.88% | 6.64% | 7.51% | 7.78% | 7.48% |
Drawdowns
TEAF vs. GBAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEAF drawdown since its inception was -62.12%, which is greater than GBAB's maximum drawdown of -35.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAF and GBAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TEAF vs. GBAB - Volatility Comparison
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) at 6.86%. This indicates that TEAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TEAF vs. GBAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities