TEAF vs. GBAB

In the year-to-date period, TEAF achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than GBAB's 2.37% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TEAF Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the GBAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEAF and GBAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, less than GBAB's 10.11% yield.

The maximum TEAF drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, which is greater than GBAB's maximum drawdown of -35.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAF and GBAB.

The current volatility for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) is 2.52%, while Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that TEAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.