PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEAF vs. GBAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

TEAF vs. GBAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TEAF vs. GBAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TEAF
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
0.00%9.74%12.16%-0.64%-5.41%19.37%-12.76%-13.82%
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
-0.37%8.38%2.86%8.57%-25.10%-0.92%14.69%8.86%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEAF:

$21.36M

GBAB:

$39.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEAF:

$14.31M

GBAB:

$20.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

TEAF:

-$435.19K

GBAB:

$108.83M

Returns By Period


TEAF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GBAB

1D
3.65%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*
3.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEAF vs. GBAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAF

GBAB
GBAB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAF vs. GBAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TEAF vs. GBAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEAFGBABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Correlation

The correlation between TEAF and GBAB is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TEAF vs. GBAB - Dividend Comparison

TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than GBAB's 10.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TEAF
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
5.16%7.37%9.00%9.22%8.25%6.18%8.17%5.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBAB
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
10.41%10.11%9.93%9.32%9.22%6.36%5.92%6.37%6.88%6.64%7.51%7.78%

Drawdowns

TEAF vs. GBAB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TEAFGBABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

Volatility

TEAF vs. GBAB - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TEAFGBABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

Financials

TEAF vs. GBAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M20212022202320242025
8.77M
11.12M
(TEAF) Total Revenue
(GBAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items