TEAF vs. GBAB
Compare and contrast key facts about Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TEAF or GBAB.
Correlation
The correlation between TEAF and GBAB is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TEAF vs. GBAB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TEAF:
1.59
GBAB:
0.28
TEAF:
2.21
GBAB:
0.50
TEAF:
1.30
GBAB:
1.06
TEAF:
0.80
GBAB:
0.16
TEAF:
5.45
GBAB:
0.50
TEAF:
2.87%
GBAB:
7.13%
TEAF:
9.83%
GBAB:
12.75%
TEAF:
-62.12%
GBAB:
-35.80%
TEAF:
-6.81%
GBAB:
-18.12%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEAF achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than GBAB's 2.43% return.
TEAF
1.00%
-0.07%
3.49%
17.18%
1.23%
N/A
GBAB
2.43%
0.45%
-0.33%
4.72%
-1.00%
3.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TEAF vs. GBAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TEAF
GBAB
TEAF vs. GBAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TEAF vs. GBAB - Dividend Comparison
TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, which matches GBAB's 8.90% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund | 8.91% | 9.00% | 9.22% | 8.25% | 6.18% | 8.19% | 5.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | 8.90% | 9.95% | 9.34% | 9.24% | 6.37% | 5.93% | 6.39% | 6.89% | 6.65% | 7.51% | 7.77% | 7.47% |
Drawdowns
TEAF vs. GBAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEAF drawdown since its inception was -62.12%, which is greater than GBAB's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAF and GBAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TEAF vs. GBAB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) is 3.83%, while Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that TEAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TEAF vs. GBAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities