TEAF vs. GBAB
TEAF (Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund) and GBAB (Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TEAF vs. GBAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TEAF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBAB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -4.71%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
TEAF vs. GBAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund | 0.00% | 9.74% | 12.16% | -0.64% | -5.41% | 19.37% | -12.76% | -13.82% |
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | -1.76% | 8.38% | 2.86% | 8.57% | -25.10% | -0.92% | 14.69% | 8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEAF and GBAB is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2019 | 0.19 |
The correlation between TEAF and GBAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TEAF:
$21.36M
GBAB:
$39.21M
TEAF:
$14.31M
GBAB:
$20.27M
TEAF:
-$435.19K
GBAB:
$108.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEAF vs. GBAB — Risk / Return Rank
TEAF
GBAB
TEAF vs. GBAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEAF | GBAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.39 | — |
Drawdowns
TEAF vs. GBAB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEAF | GBAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -14.95% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.28% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.24% | — |
Volatility
TEAF vs. GBAB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEAF | GBAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.48% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.96% | — |
Dividends
TEAF vs. GBAB - Dividend Comparison
TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than GBAB's 10.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | 10.74% | 10.11% | 9.93% | 9.32% | 9.22% | 6.36% | 5.92% | 6.37% | 6.88% | 6.64% | 7.51% | 7.78% |
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund | 3.69% | 7.37% | 9.00% | 9.22% | 8.25% | 6.18% | 8.17% | 5.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TEAF vs. GBAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TEAF and GBAB have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TEAF and GBAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer