PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TEAF vs. ARES
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TEAF and ARES is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

TEAF vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.98%
31.37%
TEAF
ARES

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TEAF:

1.94

ARES:

2.53

Sortino Ratio

TEAF:

2.70

ARES:

3.11

Omega Ratio

TEAF:

1.37

ARES:

1.40

Calmar Ratio

TEAF:

1.00

ARES:

5.48

Martin Ratio

TEAF:

6.59

ARES:

15.54

Ulcer Index

TEAF:

2.91%

ARES:

4.48%

Daily Std Dev

TEAF:

9.86%

ARES:

27.53%

Max Drawdown

TEAF:

-62.12%

ARES:

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

TEAF:

-5.24%

ARES:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEAF achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than ARES's 8.07% return.


TEAF

YTD

2.71%

1M

4.09%

6M

4.98%

1Y

19.17%

5Y*

1.68%

10Y*

N/A

ARES

YTD

8.07%

1M

13.06%

6M

31.37%

1Y

71.84%

5Y*

43.42%

10Y*

32.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TEAF vs. ARES — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TEAF is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TEAF is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TEAF is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TEAF is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TEAF is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TEAF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARES is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARES is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARES is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARES is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARES is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARES is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TEAF vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TEAF, currently valued at 1.94, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.942.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for TEAF, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.703.11
The chart of Omega ratio for TEAF, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.371.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for TEAF, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.005.48
The chart of Martin ratio for TEAF, currently valued at 6.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.006.5915.54
TEAF
ARES

The current TEAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the ARES Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEAF and ARES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.94
2.53
TEAF
ARES

Dividends

TEAF vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.76%, more than ARES's 1.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TEAF
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
8.76%9.00%9.22%8.25%6.73%8.19%5.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
1.94%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%6.30%4.32%6.81%2.45%

Drawdowns

TEAF vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEAF drawdown since its inception was -62.12%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAF and ARES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.24%
0
TEAF
ARES

Volatility

TEAF vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) is 3.39%, while Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that TEAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.39%
10.05%
TEAF
ARES

Financials

TEAF vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab