PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEAF vs. ARES
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

TEAF vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TEAF vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TEAF
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
0.00%9.74%12.16%-0.64%-5.41%19.37%-12.76%-13.82%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-33.65%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%37.37%59.32%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEAF:

$21.36M

ARES:

$6.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEAF:

$14.31M

ARES:

$2.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

TEAF:

-$435.19K

ARES:

$2.24B

Returns By Period


TEAF

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARES

1D
-3.02%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
-33.65%
6M
-29.63%
1Y
-26.47%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
26.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEAF vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAF

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAF vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TEAF vs. ARES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEAFARESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

Correlation

The correlation between TEAF and ARES is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TEAF vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than ARES's 5.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TEAF
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
5.16%7.37%9.00%9.22%8.25%6.18%8.17%5.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
5.25%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%

Drawdowns

TEAF vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TEAFARESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.49%

Volatility

TEAF vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TEAFARESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.37%

Financials

TEAF vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
8.77M
2.37B
(TEAF) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items