TCHP vs. HDV

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. TCHP is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TCHP returned 10.52%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for HDV. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCHP charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.

Performance

TCHP vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.41% return.

TCHP

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 17.97%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

HDV

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: 12.41%
• 6M: 13.07%
• 1Y: 19.37%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 11.16%
• 10Y*: 9.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCHP vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	1.62%	18.40%	36.06%	50.10%	-37.81%	18.08%	11.58%
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF	12.41%	11.90%	14.16%	1.72%	7.05%	19.45%	6.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TCHP and HDV is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020	0.28

The correlation between TCHP and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TCHP vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TCHP	HDV
Technology	48.0%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	9.2%
Communication Services	16.2%	5.7%
Financial Services	7.5%	4.7%
Healthcare	6.0%	22.6%
Industrials	3.5%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.7%	24.5%
Basic Materials	0.7%	0.8%
Utilities	0.5%	8.1%
Energy	-	20.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

TCHP vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCHP

TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 27
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 28
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 26

HDV

HDV Risk / Return Rank: 67
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCHP vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCHP	HDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	2.03	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	2.97	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.35	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	3.87	-2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.28	10.64	-7.36

TCHP vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCHP and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TCHP vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and HDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCHP	HDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.34%	-37.04%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-5.18%	-12.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	-10.49%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.34%	-15.42%	-26.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-2.79%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-3.08%	-8.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.34%	1.88%	+3.46%

Volatility

TCHP vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.38%. This indicates that TCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCHP	HDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.53%	3.38%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	7.56%	+5.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.99%	9.86%	+7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.55%	12.81%	+10.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.21%	15.74%	+7.47%

TCHP vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCHP vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF	2.94%	3.22%	3.67%	3.82%	3.56%	3.47%	4.07%	3.27%	3.67%	3.27%	3.28%	3.92%
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCHP and HDV in my portfolio?

TCHP and HDV have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCHP or HDV?

TCHP has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to HDV (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs HDV's -37.04%.

Which ETF is better, TCHP or HDV?

On 5-year performance, HDV leads with 11.16% vs 10.52% for TCHP. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCHP or HDV?

Over the 5-year period, HDV has performed better with a 11.16% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCHP or HDV?

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCHP or HDV?

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.00% for TCHP.

What is the main difference between TCHP and HDV?

TCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for TCHP and 0.08% for HDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.