TAGS vs. RSMV
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium. TAGS is passively managed, while RSMV is actively managed. Over the past year, TAGS returned -4.35% vs 23.15% for RSMV. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RSMV.
Performance
TAGS vs. RSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than RSMV's 7.92% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- -4.35%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- -1.88%
RSMV
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS vs. RSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 3.23% | -10.33% |
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF | 7.92% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and RSMV is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. RSMV — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
RSMV
TAGS vs. RSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAGS | RSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.32 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 3.20 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 11.64 | -12.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. RSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than RSMV's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and RSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | RSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -17.58% | -58.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -7.27% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.67% | -1.92% | -62.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -3.90% | -53.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 1.99% | +3.25% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. RSMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) is 3.29%, while Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that TAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | RSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 6.41% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 11.18% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 13.15% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 15.06% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 15.06% | +2.94% |
TAGS vs. RSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RSMV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. RSMV - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and RSMV have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSMV has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to TAGS (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs RSMV's -17.58%.
On 1-year performance, RSMV leads with 23.15% vs -4.35% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSMV has performed better with a 23.15% return vs -4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RSMV.
RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while RSMV is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.95% for RSMV.
RSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and RSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer