RSMV vs. CXRN

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSMV returned 18.88% vs -10.84% for CXRN. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

RSMV vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -13.39% return.

RSMV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 5.71%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 1Y: 18.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CXRN

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: 8.37%
• 6M: -15.11%
• YTD: -13.39%
• 1Y: -10.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMV vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	6.83%	10.74%
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	-13.39%	-30.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMV and CXRN is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

RSMV vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 55
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CXRN

CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 6
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMV vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSMV	CXRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	-0.33	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	-0.23	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.97	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	-0.38	+2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.07	-1.06	+10.12

RSMV vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSMV and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSMV vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum CXRN drawdown of -53.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and CXRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMV	CXRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-53.17%	+35.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.27%	-31.96%	+24.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-46.14%	+43.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-31.24%	+27.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	11.41%	-9.35%

Volatility

RSMV vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is 5.61%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.36%. This indicates that RSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSMV	CXRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	15.36%	-9.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	29.81%	-18.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	36.80%	-23.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	37.82%	-22.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	37.82%	-22.69%

RSMV vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSMV and CXRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

RSMV vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than CXRN's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	2.49%	3.30%	0.13%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.94%	1.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMV and CXRN in my portfolio?

RSMV and CXRN have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSMV or CXRN?

CXRN has higher volatility (15.36%) compared to RSMV (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMV dropped -17.58% vs CXRN's -53.17%.

Which ETF is better, RSMV or CXRN?

On 1-year performance, RSMV leads with 18.88% vs -10.84% for CXRN. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RSMV has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSMV or CXRN?

Over the 1-year period, RSMV has performed better with a 18.88% return vs -10.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSMV or CXRN?

RSMV and CXRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSMV or CXRN?

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.94% for RSMV.

What is the main difference between RSMV and CXRN?

RSMV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.