RSMV vs. MEME

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

RSMV vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 13.39% return.

RSMV

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -2.86%
• 6M: 3.16%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 1Y: 15.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.43%

MEME

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -16.21%
• 6M: -1.26%
• YTD: 13.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	$1.46M	$1.32M	$2.06M
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	$134.05K	$141.00K	$245.91K

RSMV vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	3.75%	3.37%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	13.39%	-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMV and MEME is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.61

RSMV vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSMV	MEME
Financial Services	48.4%	5.4%
Technology	20.7%	81.9%
Healthcare	10.5%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	-
Communication Services	5.8%	5.5%
Energy	4.5%	4.8%
Industrials	4.2%	7.2%
Basic Materials	3.4%	4.6%
Utilities	2.0%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	4.1%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RSMV vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 43
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSMV vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSMV	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	—	—

Drawdowns

RSMV vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -50.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMV	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-50.08%	+32.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.70%	-40.42%	+34.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-29.26%	+25.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSMV	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	79.06%	-65.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	79.06%	-64.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	79.06%	-64.01%

RSMV vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSMV vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.97%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMV and MEME in my portfolio?

RSMV and MEME have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSMV or MEME?

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSMV or MEME?

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RSMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSMV or MEME?

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between RSMV and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RSMV and 0.69% for MEME.