PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSMV vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSMV vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 33.87% return.


RSMV

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.18%
6M
5.71%
YTD
6.83%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-1.31%
1M
-15.13%
6M
7.79%
YTD
33.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMV vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSMV and MEME is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.59

RSMV vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSMV
MEME

Financial Services

41.9%
5.9%

Technology

19.0%
70.5%

Healthcare

12.7%
5.4%

Industrials

6.4%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Communication Services

4.2%
12.2%

Energy

4.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.6%

Utilities

2.1%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%
4.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

RSMV
41.9%
MEME
5.9%

Technology

RSMV
19.0%
MEME
70.5%

Healthcare

RSMV
12.7%
MEME
5.4%

Industrials

RSMV
6.4%
MEME
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

RSMV
6.4%
MEME

-

Communication Services

RSMV
4.2%
MEME
12.2%

Energy

RSMV
4.2%
MEME
4.8%

Basic Materials

RSMV
3.4%
MEME
4.6%

Utilities

RSMV
2.1%
MEME
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RSMV
2.1%
MEME
4.1%

Real Estate

RSMV

-

MEME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSMV vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMV
RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMV vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSMVMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

RSMV vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSMV vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSMVMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-48.78%

+31.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-29.66%

+26.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-28.45%

+24.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

Volatility

RSMV vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSMVMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

75.42%

-61.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

75.42%

-60.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

75.42%

-60.29%

RSMV vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSMV vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSMV and MEME have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RSMV.

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RSMV and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSMV and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer