T vs. MET
T (AT&T Inc.) and MET (MetLife, Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while MET operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.33%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for MET. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. MET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than MET's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed MET with an annualized return of 3.33%, while MET has yielded a comparatively higher 14.00% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
MET
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 13.78%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
T vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 14.21% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and MET is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2000 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between T and MET has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
MET:
$7.21
T:
7.74
MET:
12.33
T:
0.32
MET:
0.41
T:
1.35
MET:
0.58
T:
$125.65B
MET:
$76.95B
T:
$105.41B
MET:
$14.75B
T:
$54.70B
MET:
$4.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank
T
MET
T vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.13 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.91 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 2.48 | -3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and MET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -82.37% | +18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -17.46% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -21.97% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -35.09% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -55.16% | +12.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | 0.00% | -18.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -17.62% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.64% | 6.42% | +4.22% |
Volatility
T vs. MET - Volatility Comparison
AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 6.17%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 6.17% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 17.44% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 23.16% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 25.72% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 30.70% | -6.97% |
Dividends
T vs. MET - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than MET's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.58% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. MET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and MET have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to MET (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs MET's -82.37%.
MET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and MET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer