PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T vs. F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

T vs. F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and Ford Motor Company (F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than F's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed F with an annualized return of 2.99%, while F has yielded a comparatively higher 6.34% annualized return.


T

1D
1.20%
1M
8.92%
6M
6.63%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
-8.68%
3Y*
25.55%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
2.99%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

F

1D
2.16%
1M
3.89%
6M
11.80%
YTD
14.53%
1Y
34.30%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
6.34%
ALL TIME*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$756.47M$708.50M$906.52M
$2.18B$2.03B$1.39B

T vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T
AT&T Inc.
1.84%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%
F
Ford Motor Company
14.53%42.35%-13.10%10.18%-42.18%137.48%-3.88%29.64%-34.35%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between T and F is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between T and F has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

T:

$167.27B

F:

$57.46B

EPS

T:

$3.03

F:

-$1.51

PS Ratio

T:

1.36

F:

0.31

PB Ratio

T:

1.34

F:

1.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

T:

$127.24B

F:

$189.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

T:

$112.60B

F:

$17.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

T:

$49.53B

F:

$9.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T vs. F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

F
F Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
F Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
F Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
F Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.20

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

1.47

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

3.19

-3.85

T vs. F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the F Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T vs. F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.15%

-97.07%

+32.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.89%

-23.39%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.89%

-36.51%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-58.62%

+26.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-64.77%

+22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.07%

-35.22%

+21.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-44.68%

+28.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.21%

10.78%

+2.43%

Volatility

T vs. F - Volatility Comparison

AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to Ford Motor Company (F) at 7.68%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

7.68%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.87%

29.72%

-8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

37.37%

-12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

39.38%

-14.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

37.41%

-13.41%

Dividends

T vs. F - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than F's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F
Ford Motor Company
4.09%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.55%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

T vs. F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

T vs. F - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AT&T Inc. and Ford Motor Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

T - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AT&T Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.25B and revenue of 31.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.

F - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

T - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AT&T Inc. reported an operating income of 7.04B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

F - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

T - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AT&T Inc. reported a net income of 4.59B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.

F - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


T and F have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to F (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs F's -97.07%.

F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T and F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer