PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYLD vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYLD vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SYLD has outperformed FVD with an annualized return of 12.98%, while FVD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.


SYLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.34%
YTD
13.63%
6M
12.35%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
12.98%

FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYLD vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
13.63%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%13.61%26.98%-13.51%20.03%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SYLD and FVD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2013

0.77

The correlation between SYLD and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

SYLD vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SYLD
FVD

Consumer Cyclical

22.9%
5.6%

Financial Services

22.7%
19.1%

Energy

17.7%
4.0%

Industrials

8.1%
14.2%

Basic Materials

7.9%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
11.6%

Communication Services

6.0%
3.0%

Healthcare

5.6%
7.8%

Technology

2.3%
6.1%

Real Estate

-

8.1%

Utilities

-

18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SYLD
22.9%
FVD
5.6%

Financial Services

SYLD
22.7%
FVD
19.1%

Energy

SYLD
17.7%
FVD
4.0%

Industrials

SYLD
8.1%
FVD
14.2%

Basic Materials

SYLD
7.9%
FVD
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

SYLD
6.8%
FVD
11.6%

Communication Services

SYLD
6.0%
FVD
3.0%

Healthcare

SYLD
5.6%
FVD
7.8%

Technology

SYLD
2.3%
FVD
6.1%

Real Estate

SYLD

-

FVD
8.1%

Utilities

SYLD

-

FVD
18.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYLD vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYLD vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYLDFVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

0.95

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

2.58

+7.44

SYLD vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYLD and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYLDFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.72

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.41

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.58

-0.01

Drawdowns

SYLD vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYLDFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.36%

-51.00%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-7.23%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-11.97%

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-16.41%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

-35.25%

-10.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-5.96%

+4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-5.44%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.66%

-0.11%

Volatility

SYLD vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.62%. This indicates that SYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYLDFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

2.62%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

6.73%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

9.50%

+6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

12.76%

+7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.96%

15.44%

+7.52%

SYLD vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

SYLD vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FVD's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.86%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYLD and FVD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYLD has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 12.98% vs 8.30% for FVD. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.86% for SYLD.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.61% for FVD.

SYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYLD and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer