SYLD vs. FV
SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) and FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while FV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index. SYLD is actively managed, while FV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SYLD returned 13.60%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for FV. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FV.
Performance
SYLD vs. FV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than FV's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SYLD has outperformed FV with an annualized return of 13.60%, while FV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.51% annualized return.
SYLD
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 33.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.50%
FV
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 17.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.94M | $4.39M | $4.97M | |
| $2.75M | $2.44M | $3.15M |
SYLD vs. FV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 21.09% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 10.69% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 25.73% | -8.27% | 19.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYLD and FV is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SYLD and FV has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SYLD vs. FV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SYLD
FV
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SYLD
FV
Financial Services
SYLD
FV
Energy
SYLD
FV
Consumer Defensive
SYLD
FV
-
Industrials
SYLD
FV
Basic Materials
SYLD
FV
-
Communication Services
SYLD
FV
Healthcare
SYLD
FV
Technology
SYLD
FV
Real Estate
SYLD
-
FV
Utilities
SYLD
-
FV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYLD vs. FV — Risk / Return Rank
SYLD
FV
SYLD vs. FV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYLD | FV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 1.13 | +3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | 3.72 | +9.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYLD vs. FV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, which is greater than FV's maximum drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and FV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYLD | FV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -34.04% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -13.45% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -23.08% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -23.08% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | -34.04% | -11.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -8.38% | +6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -5.81% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 4.10% | -1.76% |
Volatility
SYLD vs. FV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) is 3.97%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that SYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYLD | FV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 6.58% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 15.02% | -5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01% | 17.67% | -2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 21.08% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 21.55% | +1.37% |
SYLD vs. FV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FV's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYLD vs. FV - Dividend Comparison
SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FV's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.83% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYLD and FV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FV has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to SYLD (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs FV's -34.04%.
On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.60% vs 12.51% for FV. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 12.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.52% for FV.
SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FV is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.87% for FV.
SYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYLD and FV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer