SYLD vs. FV
SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) and FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while FV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index. SYLD is actively managed, while FV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SYLD returned 13.44%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for FV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FV.
Performance
SYLD vs. FV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly lower than FV's 17.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SYLD having a 13.44% annualized return and FV not far ahead at 13.62%.
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
FV
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 30.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
SYLD vs. FV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 13.94% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 17.68% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 25.73% | -8.27% | 19.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYLD and FV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SYLD and FV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SYLD vs. FV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SYLD
FV
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SYLD
FV
Financial Services
SYLD
FV
Energy
SYLD
FV
Industrials
SYLD
FV
Basic Materials
SYLD
FV
-
Consumer Defensive
SYLD
FV
-
Communication Services
SYLD
FV
Healthcare
SYLD
FV
Technology
SYLD
FV
Real Estate
SYLD
-
FV
Utilities
SYLD
-
FV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYLD vs. FV — Risk / Return Rank
SYLD
FV
SYLD vs. FV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYLD | FV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 2.25 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 8.37 | +1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYLD vs. FV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, which is greater than FV's maximum drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and FV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYLD | FV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -34.04% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -13.45% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -23.08% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -23.08% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | -34.04% | -11.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -0.46% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -5.81% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 3.60% | -1.03% |
Volatility
SYLD vs. FV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) is 3.51%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that SYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYLD | FV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 6.31% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 13.52% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 16.09% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 20.89% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 21.49% | +1.48% |
SYLD vs. FV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FV's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYLD vs. FV - Dividend Comparison
SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than FV's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYLD and FV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FV has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to SYLD (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs FV's -34.04%.
On 10-year performance, FV leads with 13.62% vs 13.44% for SYLD. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FV has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.52% for FV.
SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FV is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.87% for FV.
FV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYLD and FV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer