SYLD vs. XMVM
SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. SYLD is actively managed, while XMVM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SYLD returned 13.44%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for XMVM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
SYLD vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SYLD has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 13.44%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.10% annualized return.
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
XMVM
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
SYLD vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 13.94% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 10.47% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYLD and XMVM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SYLD and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SYLD vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SYLD
XMVM
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SYLD
XMVM
Financial Services
SYLD
XMVM
Energy
SYLD
XMVM
Industrials
SYLD
XMVM
Basic Materials
SYLD
XMVM
Consumer Defensive
SYLD
XMVM
Communication Services
SYLD
XMVM
Healthcare
SYLD
XMVM
Technology
SYLD
XMVM
Real Estate
SYLD
-
XMVM
Utilities
SYLD
-
XMVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYLD vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
SYLD
XMVM
SYLD vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYLD | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.53 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 10.91 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYLD vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYLD | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -62.83% | +17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -9.18% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -24.12% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -24.12% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | -45.07% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -1.49% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -10.25% | +4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.96% | -0.39% |
Volatility
SYLD vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that SYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYLD | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 3.30% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 9.65% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 15.29% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 21.45% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 22.82% | +0.15% |
SYLD vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYLD vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than XMVM's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 2.38% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYLD and XMVM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SYLD has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs XMVM's -62.83%.
On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.44% vs 12.10% for XMVM. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 12.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.86% for SYLD.
SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XMVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.39% for XMVM.
XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYLD and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer