PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYLD vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYLD vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SYLD has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 13.44%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.10% annualized return.


SYLD

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
13.94%
6M
12.50%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
13.44%

XMVM

1D
0.97%
1M
2.30%
YTD
10.47%
6M
8.53%
1Y
32.24%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYLD vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
13.94%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%13.61%26.98%-13.51%20.03%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
10.47%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SYLD and XMVM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.89

The correlation between SYLD and XMVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SYLD vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SYLD
XMVM

Consumer Cyclical

23.5%
15.0%

Financial Services

22.7%
41.9%

Energy

17.1%
8.0%

Industrials

8.3%
8.8%

Basic Materials

8.0%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
7.1%

Communication Services

6.0%
0.9%

Healthcare

5.7%
0.7%

Technology

2.1%
4.0%

Real Estate

-

4.2%

Utilities

-

9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SYLD
23.5%
XMVM
15.0%

Financial Services

SYLD
22.7%
XMVM
41.9%

Energy

SYLD
17.1%
XMVM
8.0%

Industrials

SYLD
8.3%
XMVM
8.8%

Basic Materials

SYLD
8.0%
XMVM
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

SYLD
6.7%
XMVM
7.1%

Communication Services

SYLD
6.0%
XMVM
0.9%

Healthcare

SYLD
5.7%
XMVM
0.7%

Technology

SYLD
2.1%
XMVM
4.0%

Real Estate

SYLD

-

XMVM
4.2%

Utilities

SYLD

-

XMVM
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYLD vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYLD vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYLDXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.53

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

10.91

-0.83

SYLD vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYLD and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYLD vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYLDXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.36%

-62.83%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-9.18%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-24.12%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-24.12%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

-45.07%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-1.49%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-10.25%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.96%

-0.39%

Volatility

SYLD vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that SYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYLDXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.30%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

9.65%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

15.29%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

21.45%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

22.82%

+0.15%

SYLD vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SYLD vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than XMVM's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.86%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
2.38%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYLD and XMVM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYLD has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.44% vs 12.10% for XMVM. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 12.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.86% for SYLD.

SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XMVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYLD and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer