PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYAX vs. TDIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX) and Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYAX achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly higher than TDIFX's 3.88% return.


SWYAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.08%
YTD
4.71%
6M
4.84%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*

TDIFX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.22%
YTD
3.88%
6M
3.88%
1Y
8.34%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYAX
Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund
4.71%11.17%7.18%11.95%-13.28%6.99%10.61%14.55%-2.27%9.48%
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
3.88%7.22%6.21%7.76%-9.37%14.53%9.33%9.96%-1.98%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYAX and TDIFX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.85

The correlation between SWYAX and TDIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYAX vs. TDIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYAX
SWYAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIFX
TDIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TDIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX) and Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWYAXTDIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.57

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.56

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

15.52

-1.53

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the TDIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYAX and TDIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWYAXTDIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.79

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.89

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.06

-0.27

Drawdowns

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYAX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than TDIFX's maximum drawdown of -12.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYAX and TDIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYAXTDIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-12.21%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.16%

-2.61%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.50%

-3.51%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-12.21%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-1.75%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.58%

+0.34%

Volatility

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) at 1.01%. This indicates that SWYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYAXTDIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.01%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

2.49%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

3.33%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.78%

5.89%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

5.06%

+2.38%

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYAX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIFX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYAX vs. TDIFX - Dividend Comparison

SWYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than TDIFX's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SWYAX
Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund
3.98%4.17%3.79%2.85%2.69%2.54%1.98%2.27%2.01%1.18%0.75%
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
1.99%1.77%3.11%3.09%4.66%9.39%1.39%1.98%2.11%0.98%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWYAX and TDIFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWYAX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to TDIFX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYAX dropped -19.82% vs TDIFX's -12.21%.

TDIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYAX and TDIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer