PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYAX vs. SWAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYAX achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than SWAGX's -0.73% return.


SWYAX

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.24%
6M
2.03%
YTD
3.27%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.65%

SWAGX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.46%
6M
-0.73%
YTD
-0.73%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYAX
Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund
3.27%11.17%7.18%11.95%-13.28%6.99%10.61%14.55%-2.27%6.88%
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
-0.73%7.11%1.38%5.46%-13.62%-2.29%7.39%8.64%-0.11%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYAX and SWAGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017

0.37

Over the past year, SWYAX and SWAGX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYAX vs. SWAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWYAX
SWYAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SWYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SWAGX
SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWYAXSWAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.11

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

0.85

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

2.13

+6.10

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the SWAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYAX and SWAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYAX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SWAGX drawdown of -19.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYAX and SWAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYAXSWAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-19.68%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.16%

-3.05%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-5.01%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-18.76%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-4.46%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-5.65%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.21%

-0.25%

Volatility

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) at 1.00%. This indicates that SWYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYAXSWAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.00%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.57%

3.04%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.51%

3.94%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.84%

6.09%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.42%

5.09%

+2.33%

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SWYAX and SWAGX have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYAX vs. SWAGX - Dividend Comparison

SWYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than SWAGX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.22%4.02%3.88%3.22%1.93%1.56%2.47%2.87%2.80%1.98%0.00%
SWYAX
Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund
4.04%4.17%3.79%2.85%2.69%2.54%1.98%2.27%2.01%1.18%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWYAX and SWAGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWYAX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to SWAGX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYAX dropped -19.82% vs SWAGX's -19.68%.

SWYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYAX and SWAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer