SWBRX vs. URINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX).
SWBRX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005. URINX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jul 30, 2008.
Performance
SWBRX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWBRX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBRX Schwab Target 2010 Fund | -0.45% | 11.25% | 7.36% | 11.82% | -14.21% | 6.98% | 11.19% | 14.52% | -3.45% | 10.24% |
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund | 1.06% | 12.36% | 6.66% | 10.79% | -10.38% | 6.47% | 8.74% | 11.72% | -3.00% | 8.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBRX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than URINX's 1.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SWBRX having a 5.47% annualized return and URINX not far ahead at 5.51%.
SWBRX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
URINX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 11.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWBRX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWBRX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank
SWBRX
URINX
SWBRX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWBRX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.88 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.68 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.63 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 11.27 | -2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWBRX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.88 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.74 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.95 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.11 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBRX and URINX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWBRX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison
SWBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than URINX's 6.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBRX Schwab Target 2010 Fund | 7.57% | 7.53% | 6.88% | 4.35% | 4.59% | 4.86% | 2.64% | 4.91% | 6.25% | 2.22% | 1.79% | 1.86% |
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund | 6.05% | 6.07% | 4.22% | 3.48% | 6.63% | 6.66% | 3.97% | 6.37% | 6.11% | 5.68% | 3.34% | 4.54% |
Drawdowns
SWBRX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBRX drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBRX and URINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBRX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -15.27% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -3.92% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -15.27% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.40% | -15.27% | -7.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -2.38% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -1.93% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.03% | +0.11% |
Volatility
SWBRX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWBRX | URINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.57% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 3.86% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.54% | 6.08% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.77% | 6.23% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 5.79% | +1.87% |