PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URINX vs. TCLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URINX vs. TCLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URINX achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly higher than TCLEX's 4.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with URINX having a 5.76% annualized return and TCLEX not far ahead at 5.87%.


URINX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.71%
YTD
5.67%
6M
6.22%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
5.76%

TCLEX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.37%
YTD
4.09%
6M
4.61%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
5.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URINX vs. TCLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.67%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%8.34%
TCLEX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund
4.09%11.22%7.31%10.64%-12.64%6.62%10.95%15.14%-4.14%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between URINX and TCLEX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2008

0.94

The correlation between URINX and TCLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URINX vs. TCLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TCLEX
TCLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TCLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URINX vs. TCLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URINXTCLEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

2.47

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

3.66

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.49

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.00

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

13.38

+2.01

URINX vs. TCLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the TCLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URINX and TCLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URINXTCLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.47

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.61

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.84

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.61

+0.54

Drawdowns

URINX vs. TCLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URINX drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum TCLEX drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URINX and TCLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URINXTCLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-35.33%

+20.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-4.28%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.84%

-8.25%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.27%

-17.31%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.27%

-17.31%

+2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-3.99%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.96%

-0.06%

Volatility

URINX vs. TCLEX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund (TCLEX) at 1.67%. This indicates that URINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URINXTCLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

1.67%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.23%

4.10%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.18%

5.07%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

6.90%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

7.00%

-1.16%

URINX vs. TCLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URINX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TCLEX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

URINX vs. TCLEX - Dividend Comparison

URINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than TCLEX's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCLEX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2010 Fund
5.12%5.33%4.44%2.95%5.91%8.53%6.93%3.95%5.60%1.72%3.45%2.47%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.79%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, URINX and TCLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URINX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to TCLEX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URINX dropped -15.27% vs TCLEX's -35.33%.

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URINX and TCLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer