PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWBRX vs. SWYGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWBRX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than SWYGX's 10.03% return.


SWBRX

1D
0.51%
1M
0.80%
YTD
3.97%
6M
3.98%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
5.82%

SWYGX

1D
0.91%
1M
1.47%
YTD
10.03%
6M
9.80%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWBRX
Schwab Target 2010 Fund
3.97%11.25%7.36%11.82%-14.21%6.98%11.19%14.52%-3.45%10.24%
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
10.03%17.57%12.83%19.45%-16.94%15.68%14.19%23.63%-6.62%19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SWBRX and SWYGX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.92

The correlation between SWBRX and SWYGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWBRX vs. SWYGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWBRX
SWBRX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SWBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYGX
SWYGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWBRXSWYGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.07

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.39

13.49

-2.10

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWBRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SWYGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWBRX and SWYGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWBRX drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, which is greater than SWYGX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBRX and SWYGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWBRXSWYGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.52%

-27.62%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-7.50%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.55%

-12.96%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

-24.07%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.31%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-4.16%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.70%

-0.70%

Volatility

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) is 2.22%, while Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that SWBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWYGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWBRXSWYGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

4.09%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

8.54%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.50%

10.36%

-4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

13.26%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.70%

14.04%

-6.34%

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWBRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWYGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWBRX vs. SWYGX - Dividend Comparison

SWBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than SWYGX's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWBRX
Schwab Target 2010 Fund
7.25%7.53%6.88%4.35%4.59%4.86%2.64%4.91%6.25%2.22%1.79%1.86%
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
2.03%2.23%2.28%2.06%2.03%1.80%1.72%1.95%2.21%1.44%1.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SWBRX and SWYGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWYGX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SWBRX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWBRX dropped -37.52% vs SWYGX's -27.62%.

SWYGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWBRX and SWYGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer