SWBRX vs. SWLSX
SWBRX (Schwab Target 2010 Fund) and SWLSX (Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™) are both mutual funds - SWBRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SWLSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 10 years, SWBRX returned 5.82%/yr vs 16.70%/yr for SWLSX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWBRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SWLSX.
Performance
SWBRX vs. SWLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBRX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than SWLSX's 8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBRX has underperformed SWLSX with an annualized return of 5.82%, while SWLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.70% annualized return.
SWBRX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
SWLSX
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 27.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
SWBRX vs. SWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBRX Schwab Target 2010 Fund | 3.97% | 11.25% | 7.36% | 11.82% | -14.21% | 6.98% | 11.19% | 14.52% | -3.45% | 10.24% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 8.77% | 19.69% | 29.41% | 38.27% | -27.00% | 29.03% | 29.03% | 31.02% | -7.93% | 29.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBRX and SWLSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SWBRX and SWLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (3 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWBRX vs. SWLSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWBRX
SWLSX
SWBRX vs. SWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWBRX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.27 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.63 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.39 | 5.55 | +5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWBRX vs. SWLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBRX drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, smaller than the maximum SWLSX drawdown of -49.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBRX and SWLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBRX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -49.89% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -16.17% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.55% | -22.93% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -31.32% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.40% | -31.32% | +8.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -2.16% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -7.92% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 4.75% | -3.75% |
Volatility
SWBRX vs. SWLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) is 2.22%, while Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that SWBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWBRX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 6.40% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.52% | 13.44% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.50% | 16.92% | -11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.83% | 21.18% | -12.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.70% | 20.91% | -13.21% |
SWBRX vs. SWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLSX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWBRX vs. SWLSX - Dividend Comparison
SWBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than SWLSX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBRX Schwab Target 2010 Fund | 7.25% | 7.53% | 6.88% | 4.35% | 4.59% | 4.86% | 2.64% | 4.91% | 6.25% | 2.22% | 1.79% | 1.86% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 1.07% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 2.07% | 7.77% | 1.07% | 5.32% | 12.35% | 7.92% | 4.46% | 17.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWBRX and SWLSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWLSX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to SWBRX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWBRX dropped -37.52% vs SWLSX's -49.89%.
SWBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWBRX and SWLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer