PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWBRX vs. SWYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWBRX achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than SWYAX's 4.71% return.


SWBRX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.91%
YTD
4.12%
6M
4.28%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
5.81%

SWYAX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.08%
YTD
4.71%
6M
4.84%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWBRX
Schwab Target 2010 Fund
4.12%11.25%7.36%11.82%-14.21%6.98%11.19%14.52%-3.45%10.24%
SWYAX
Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund
4.71%11.17%7.18%11.95%-13.28%6.99%10.61%14.55%-2.27%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SWBRX and SWYAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.97

The correlation between SWBRX and SWYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWBRX vs. SWYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWBRX
SWBRX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SWBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYAX
SWYAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWBRXSWYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.49

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.10

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.40

13.99

-1.59

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWBRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SWYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWBRX and SWYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWBRXSWYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.50

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.61

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.80

-0.21

Drawdowns

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWBRX drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, which is greater than SWYAX's maximum drawdown of -19.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBRX and SWYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWBRXSWYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.52%

-19.82%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-4.16%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.55%

-6.50%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.40%

-19.82%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-3.36%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.92%

+0.06%

Volatility

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2010 Fund (SWBRX) and Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund (SWYAX) have volatilities of 1.76% and 1.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWBRXSWYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

1.78%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

4.14%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.20%

5.15%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.79%

7.78%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.68%

7.44%

+0.24%

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWBRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SWYAX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWBRX vs. SWYAX - Dividend Comparison

SWBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than SWYAX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWBRX
Schwab Target 2010 Fund
7.24%7.53%6.88%4.35%4.59%4.86%2.64%4.91%6.25%2.22%1.79%1.86%
SWYAX
Schwab Target 2010 Index Fund
3.98%4.17%3.79%2.85%2.69%2.54%1.98%2.27%2.01%1.18%0.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SWBRX and SWYAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWYAX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to SWBRX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWBRX dropped -37.52% vs SWYAX's -19.82%.

SWYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWBRX and SWYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer