SWAN vs. NOBL
SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWAN returned 3.05%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for NOBL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
SWAN vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 7.43% return.
SWAN
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
SWAN vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 3.83% | 13.93% | 13.44% | 12.07% | -27.77% | 10.55% | 16.17% | 22.03% | -2.27% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 7.43% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWAN and NOBL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SWAN and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWAN vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
SWAN
NOBL
SWAN vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWAN | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.38 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | 3.53 | +4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWAN vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, smaller than the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWAN | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -35.43% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -9.11% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.07% | -15.36% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.04% | -17.92% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -2.43% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -3.48% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 3.56% | -1.73% |
Volatility
SWAN vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.95%. This indicates that SWAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWAN | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 2.95% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 8.11% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.78% | 11.52% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 14.41% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 16.61% | -4.12% |
SWAN vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWAN vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.83% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWAN and NOBL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWAN has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 5-year performance, NOBL leads with 5.94% vs 3.05% for SWAN. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 5.94% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SWAN.
SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.
SWAN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while NOBL is Dividend. SWAN tracks S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.35% for NOBL.
SWAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWAN and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer