SVM vs. GGP.L
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) and GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — SVM in Silver, GGP.L in Gold. Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 16.92%/yr vs 59.55%/yr for GGP.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. GGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SVM is traded in USD, while GGP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than GGP.L's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has underperformed GGP.L with an annualized return of 16.92%, while GGP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 59.55% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- -20.20%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 140.00%
- 3Y*
- 53.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.92%
GGP.L
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -18.10%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 78.16%
- 3Y*
- 64.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 59.55%
SVM vs. GGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 21.23% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 15.09% | 340.75% | -36.57% | 29.75% | -55.34% | -57.03% | 2,012.80% | 3.44% | -8.69% | 1,104.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and GGP.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, SVM and GGP.L have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SVM:
$2.23B
GGP.L:
£4.17B
SVM:
-$0.05
GGP.L:
£0.47
SVM:
5.08
GGP.L:
4.45
SVM:
2.37
GGP.L:
4.95
SVM:
$437.11M
GGP.L:
£937.29M
SVM:
$254.02M
GGP.L:
£483.25M
SVM:
$185.32M
GGP.L:
£477.73M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. GGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
GGP.L
SVM vs. GGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 2.43 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 5.83 | +3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. GGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GGP.L drawdown of -98.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and GGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -98.61% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -31.98% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -54.95% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.98% | -77.84% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -87.05% | +10.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.92% | -25.05% | -23.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.59% | -67.59% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.57% | 13.36% | +1.21% |
Volatility
SVM vs. GGP.L - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 27.03% compared to Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) at 20.50%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.03% | 20.50% | +6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.80% | 45.46% | +12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.44% | 65.33% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.00% | 66.63% | -10.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 91.82% | -29.89% |
Dividends
SVM vs. GGP.L - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
SVM vs. GGP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silvercorp Metals Inc. and Greatland Gold plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SVM vs. GGP.L - Profitability Comparison
SVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.96M and revenue of 145.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
GGP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
SVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.3%.
GGP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
SVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -606.31K and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
GGP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and GGP.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SVM and GGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer