GGP.L vs. NEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM).
Performance
GGP.L vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGP.L vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 27.03% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | -2.95% | 997.06% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 16.62% | 153.38% | -6.22% | -13.32% | -11.35% | 8.42% | 36.16% | 25.55% | -0.58% | 1.31% |
Different Trading Currencies
GGP.L is traded in GBp, while NEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NEM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
GGP.L:
£0.48
NEM:
$7.91
GGP.L:
13.85
NEM:
14.42
GGP.L:
4.73
NEM:
5.42
GGP.L:
£937.29M
NEM:
$15.51B
GGP.L:
£483.25M
NEM:
$7.14B
GGP.L:
£477.73M
NEM:
$13.38B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 27.03% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's 16.62% return. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 72.13%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.56% annualized return.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 81.42%
- 1Y
- 167.02%
- 3Y*
- 56.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 72.13%
NEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 6M
- 34.49%
- 1Y
- 136.91%
- 3Y*
- 32.58%
- 5Y*
- 17.53%
- 10Y*
- 19.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
NEM
GGP.L vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGP.L | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 3.01 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 3.09 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | 5.27 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 17.78 | -5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGP.L | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 3.01 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.50 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.56 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.25 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and NEM is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GGP.L vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 0.89% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -75.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and NEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.48% | -81.30% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.27% | -27.25% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.39% | -62.40% | -15.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | -62.40% | -23.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -13.39% | +2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -41.49% | -24.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.82% | 8.27% | +5.55% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 27.77% compared to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) at 13.98%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.77% | 13.98% | +13.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.25% | 36.63% | +8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.98% | 44.43% | +26.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.86% | 34.92% | +30.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.52% | 34.74% | +57.78% |
Financials
GGP.L vs. NEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greatland Gold plc and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities