GGP.L vs. EDV.L

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L).

Performance

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc	27.03%	309.83%	-35.50%	23.25%	-50.00%	-23.08%
EDV.L Endeavour Mining Corp	20.60%	183.47%	-15.30%	4.01%	8.12%	-0.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GGP.L : £4.53B EDV.L : £11.09B
EPS GGP.L : £0.48 EDV.L : £2.78
PE Ratio GGP.L : 13.85 EDV.L : 16.57
PS Ratio GGP.L : 4.73 EDV.L : 2.65
PB Ratio GGP.L : 5.37 EDV.L : 3.66
Total Revenue (TTM) GGP.L : £937.29M EDV.L : £4.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) GGP.L : £483.25M EDV.L : £2.09B
EBITDA (TTM) GGP.L : £477.73M EDV.L : £2.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 27.03% return, which is significantly higher than EDV.L's 20.60% return.

GGP.L

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: -5.25%
• YTD: 27.03%
• 6M: 81.42%
• 1Y: 167.02%
• 3Y*: 56.73%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: 72.13%

EDV.L

• 1D: -2.42%
• 1M: -3.68%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 50.05%
• 1Y: 158.27%
• 3Y*: 36.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GGP.L vs. EDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGP.L

GGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
GGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

EDV.L

EDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
EDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGP.L	EDV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	3.46	-1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.52	-0.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.46	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.80	6.75	-1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	22.42	-10.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the EDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGP.L and EDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGP.L	EDV.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	3.46	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.74	-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between GGP.L and EDV.L is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Dividend Comparison

GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDV.L Endeavour Mining Corp	2.39%	2.33%	4.36%	3.49%	2.94%	1.27%

Drawdowns

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, which is greater than EDV.L's maximum drawdown of -40.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and EDV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGP.L	EDV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.48%	-40.81%	-57.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.27%	-23.46%	-11.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.35%	-11.73%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.64%	-14.07%	-51.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.82%	7.06%	+6.76%

Volatility

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Volatility Comparison

Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 27.77% compared to Endeavour Mining Corp (EDV.L) at 16.51%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGP.L	EDV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.77%	16.51%	+11.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.25%	36.63%	+8.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.98%	45.92%	+25.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.86%	37.45%	+28.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.52%	37.45%	+55.07%

Financials

GGP.L vs. EDV.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Greatland Gold plc and Endeavour Mining Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GGP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

EDV.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Endeavour Mining Corp reported a gross profit of 654.61M and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.

GGP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

EDV.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Endeavour Mining Corp reported an operating income of 568.41M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.0%.

GGP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.

EDV.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Endeavour Mining Corp reported a net income of 68.86M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.