GGP.L vs. QUBT
Compare and contrast key facts about Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT).
Performance
GGP.L vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGP.L vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 27.03% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | 41.41% |
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | -31.77% | -42.42% | 1,744.17% | -42.55% | -50.45% | -75.60% | 356.52% | -3.80% | -40.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
GGP.L is traded in GBp, while QUBT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QUBT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
GGP.L:
£4.53B
QUBT:
$1.48B
GGP.L:
£0.48
QUBT:
-$0.11
GGP.L:
4.73
QUBT:
1.76K
GGP.L:
5.37
QUBT:
0.93
GGP.L:
£937.29M
QUBT:
$682.00K
GGP.L:
£483.25M
QUBT:
$67.00K
GGP.L:
£477.73M
QUBT:
-$36.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 27.03% return, which is significantly higher than QUBT's -31.77% return.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 81.42%
- 1Y
- 167.02%
- 3Y*
- 56.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 72.13%
QUBT
- 1D
- 4.12%
- 1M
- -14.76%
- YTD
- -31.77%
- 6M
- -71.56%
- 1Y
- -10.06%
- 3Y*
- 63.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
QUBT
GGP.L vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGP.L | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | -0.12 | +2.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 0.71 | +1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.07 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | -0.18 | +4.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | -0.33 | +12.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGP.L | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | -0.12 | +2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | -0.00 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.02 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and QUBT is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GGP.L vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGP.L nor QUBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and QUBT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.48% | -97.53% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.27% | -74.37% | +39.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.39% | -95.63% | +17.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -73.25% | +61.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -73.24% | +7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.82% | 41.00% | -27.18% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison
Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 27.77% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) at 15.76%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | QUBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.77% | 15.76% | +12.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.25% | 69.93% | -24.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.98% | 114.02% | -43.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.86% | 133.58% | -67.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.52% | 178.70% | -86.18% |
Financials
GGP.L vs. QUBT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greatland Gold plc and Quantum Computing, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities