GGP.L vs. FRES.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L).
Performance
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 27.03% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | -2.95% | 997.06% |
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | 3.06% | 468.22% | 6.13% | -32.98% | 3.90% | -18.79% | 78.92% | -24.01% | -38.26% | 18.98% |
Fundamentals
GGP.L:
£4.53B
FRES.L:
£25.32B
GGP.L:
£0.48
FRES.L:
£2.08
GGP.L:
13.85
FRES.L:
16.55
GGP.L:
4.73
FRES.L:
3.15
GGP.L:
5.37
FRES.L:
5.46
GGP.L:
£937.29M
FRES.L:
£8.03B
GGP.L:
£483.25M
FRES.L:
£3.75B
GGP.L:
£477.73M
FRES.L:
£3.90B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 27.03% return, which is significantly higher than FRES.L's 3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L has outperformed FRES.L with an annualized return of 72.13%, while FRES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 16.87% annualized return.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 81.42%
- 1Y
- 167.02%
- 3Y*
- 56.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 72.13%
FRES.L
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 48.49%
- 1Y
- 295.38%
- 3Y*
- 71.17%
- 5Y*
- 34.71%
- 10Y*
- 16.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. FRES.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
FRES.L
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGP.L | FRES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 5.42 | -3.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 4.44 | -1.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.60 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | 9.52 | -4.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 30.12 | -17.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGP.L | FRES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 5.42 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.84 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.39 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.29 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and FRES.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison
GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | 1.94% | 2.00% | 1.35% | 1.98% | 2.44% | 2.66% | 1.00% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 1.74% | 0.74% | 0.47% |
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, which is greater than FRES.L's maximum drawdown of -82.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and FRES.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | FRES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.48% | -82.36% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.27% | -31.03% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.39% | -53.75% | -24.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | -74.47% | -11.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -22.75% | +11.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -40.48% | -25.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.82% | 9.81% | +4.01% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison
Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 27.77% compared to Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) at 18.94%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | FRES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.77% | 18.94% | +8.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.25% | 43.18% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.98% | 53.09% | +17.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.86% | 41.29% | +24.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.52% | 43.02% | +49.50% |
Financials
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greatland Gold plc and Fresnillo plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GGP.L vs. FRES.L - Profitability Comparison
GGP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
FRES.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 2.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.
GGP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
FRES.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fresnillo plc reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 53.5%.
GGP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.
FRES.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a net income of 994.96M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.