STRL vs. GIS
STRL (Sterling Construction Company, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 68.46%/yr vs -3.08%/yr for GIS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 191.24% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 68.46%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.08% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 191.24%
- 6M
- 174.74%
- 1Y
- 332.96%
- 3Y*
- 155.47%
- 5Y*
- 104.86%
- 10Y*
- 68.46%
GIS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -26.51%
- 6M
- -25.64%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -22.93%
- 5Y*
- -8.46%
- 10Y*
- -3.08%
STRL vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 191.24% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -26.51% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and GIS is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995 | 0.08 |
The correlation between STRL and GIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$27.68B
GIS:
$17.98B
STRL:
$11.19
GIS:
$4.08
STRL:
79.71
GIS:
8.12
STRL:
1.70
GIS:
3.50
STRL:
9.58
GIS:
0.98
STRL:
23.27
GIS:
1.92
STRL:
$2.88B
GIS:
$18.37B
STRL:
$664.66M
GIS:
$4.70B
STRL:
$429.99M
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
GIS
STRL vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STRL | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.74 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.82 | -0.95 | +11.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.19 | -1.94 | +32.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STRL | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13 | -1.52 | +5.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.85 | -0.40 | +2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.29 | -0.14 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.42 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
STRL vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -59.63% | -32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -37.97% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -55.56% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -59.63% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -59.63% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.25% | -58.42% | +48.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.31% | -10.27% | -36.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.09% | 18.63% | -7.54% |
Volatility
STRL vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 24.22% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.96%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.22% | 6.96% | +17.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.81% | 18.58% | +45.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.49% | 23.84% | +57.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.99% | 21.13% | +35.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.42% | 22.09% | +31.33% |
Dividends
STRL vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.36% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
STRL vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and GIS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (24.22%) compared to GIS (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs GIS's -59.63%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer