STRL vs. MTZ

In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 101.42% return, which is significantly higher than MTZ's 74.42% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed MTZ with an annualized return of 39.26%, while MTZ has yielded a comparatively lower 19.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current STRL Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the MTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRL and MTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither STRL nor MTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, smaller than the maximum MTZ drawdown of -97.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and MTZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) at 10.10%. This indicates that STRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and MasTec, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.