STRL vs. MTZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: STRL or MTZ.
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and MTZ is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
STRL vs. MTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
STRL:
41.16%
MTZ:
8.91%
STRL:
-1.06%
MTZ:
0.00%
STRL:
-1.06%
MTZ:
0.00%
Fundamentals
STRL:
$5.41B
MTZ:
$11.69B
STRL:
$8.55
MTZ:
$2.73
STRL:
20.79
MTZ:
54.29
STRL:
1.54
MTZ:
0.69
STRL:
2.57
MTZ:
0.94
STRL:
6.71
MTZ:
4.05
STRL:
$2.11B
MTZ:
$12.46B
STRL:
$439.78M
MTZ:
$1.50B
STRL:
$437.53M
MTZ:
$948.13M
Returns By Period
STRL
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MTZ
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
STRL vs. MTZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
STRL
MTZ
STRL vs. MTZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
STRL vs. MTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor MTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
STRL vs. MTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -1.06%, which is greater than MTZ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and MTZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
STRL vs. MTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
STRL vs. MTZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and MasTec, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. MTZ - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.84M and revenue of 430.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
MTZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 311.10M and revenue of 2.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.08M and revenue of 430.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
MTZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 144.93M and revenue of 2.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 39.48M and revenue of 430.95M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
MTZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 9.90M and revenue of 2.85B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.