STRL vs. CLS
STRL (Sterling Construction Company, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, STRL returned 68.46%/yr vs 43.16%/yr for CLS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRL vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRL achieves a 191.24% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 30.75% return. Over the past 10 years, STRL has outperformed CLS with an annualized return of 68.46%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively lower 43.16% annualized return.
STRL
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 191.24%
- 6M
- 174.74%
- 1Y
- 332.96%
- 3Y*
- 155.47%
- 5Y*
- 104.86%
- 10Y*
- 68.46%
CLS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 30.75%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 220.14%
- 3Y*
- 209.55%
- 5Y*
- 114.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.16%
STRL vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Construction Company, Inc. | 191.24% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 30.75% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRL and CLS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, STRL and CLS have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
STRL:
$27.68B
CLS:
$44.72B
STRL:
$11.19
CLS:
$8.28
STRL:
79.71
CLS:
46.65
STRL:
1.70
CLS:
0.63
STRL:
9.58
CLS:
3.24
STRL:
23.27
CLS:
21.31
STRL:
$2.88B
CLS:
$13.81B
STRL:
$664.66M
CLS:
$1.60B
STRL:
$429.99M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRL vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
STRL
CLS
STRL vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STRL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.39 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.82 | 7.58 | +3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.19 | 18.88 | +11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STRL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13 | 3.06 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.85 | 2.01 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.29 | 0.87 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
STRL vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRL drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRL and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -96.93% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.02% | -29.24% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.67% | -53.96% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.67% | -53.96% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.60% | -80.60% | +21.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.25% | -18.18% | +7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.31% | -73.36% | +27.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.09% | 11.72% | -0.63% |
Volatility
STRL vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) is 24.22%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.60%. This indicates that STRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRL | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.22% | 26.60% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.81% | 55.08% | +8.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.49% | 72.52% | +8.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.99% | 57.62% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.42% | 49.93% | +3.49% |
Dividends
STRL vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither STRL nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
STRL vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRL vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRL and CLS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to STRL (24.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRL dropped -92.51% vs CLS's -96.93%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRL and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer