STRA vs. LINC
STRA (Strategic Education, Inc.) and LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Education & Training Services industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, STRA returned 7.54%/yr vs 42.69%/yr for LINC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRA vs. LINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRA achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than LINC's 104.27% return. Over the past 10 years, STRA has underperformed LINC with an annualized return of 7.54%, while LINC has yielded a comparatively higher 42.69% annualized return.
STRA
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- 1Y
- -8.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
LINC
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 104.27%
- 6M
- 103.26%
- 1Y
- 119.44%
- 3Y*
- 99.10%
- 5Y*
- 44.87%
- 10Y*
- 42.69%
STRA vs. LINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRA Strategic Education, Inc. | -3.24% | -11.62% | 3.53% | 21.43% | 40.39% | -37.26% | -38.80% | 42.05% | 28.16% | 12.41% |
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 104.27% | 52.65% | 57.57% | 73.40% | -22.49% | 14.92% | 140.74% | -15.62% | 58.42% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRA and LINC is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, STRA and LINC have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
STRA:
$1.69B
LINC:
$1.55B
STRA:
$5.64
LINC:
$0.72
STRA:
13.56
LINC:
68.89
STRA:
0.47
LINC:
2.42
STRA:
1.38
LINC:
2.83
STRA:
1.04
LINC:
7.77
STRA:
$1.27B
LINC:
$544.69M
STRA:
$475.81M
LINC:
$242.75M
STRA:
$216.79M
LINC:
$49.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRA vs. LINC — Risk / Return Rank
STRA
LINC
STRA vs. LINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STRA | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.41 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 4.39 | -4.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 11.86 | -13.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STRA vs. LINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRA drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, smaller than the maximum LINC drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRA and LINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRA | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.50% | -99.11% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -27.35% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.05% | -27.35% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.05% | -41.96% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.86% | -57.51% | -14.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.79% | -5.17% | -53.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.05% | -59.00% | +19.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.56% | 10.11% | -2.55% |
Volatility
STRA vs. LINC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is 8.02%, while Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a volatility of 13.01%. This indicates that STRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRA | LINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 13.01% | -4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.74% | 32.10% | -5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.30% | 46.96% | -14.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 44.15% | -10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.04% | 57.04% | -20.00% |
Dividends
STRA vs. LINC - Dividend Comparison
STRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, while LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STRA Strategic Education, Inc. | 3.14% | 2.99% | 2.57% | 2.60% | 3.06% | 4.15% | 2.52% | 1.32% | 1.32% | 1.12% |
Financials
STRA vs. LINC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategic Education, Inc. and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STRA vs. LINC - Profitability Comparison
STRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 305.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
STRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported an operating income of 41.09M and revenue of 305.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
STRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Strategic Education, Inc. reported a net income of 32.81M and revenue of 305.93M, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STRA and LINC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINC has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to STRA (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRA dropped -85.50% vs LINC's -99.11%.
LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRA and LINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer