PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRA vs. LINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

STRA vs. LINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

STRA vs. LINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STRA
Strategic Education, Inc.
4.20%-11.62%3.53%21.43%40.39%-37.26%-38.80%42.05%28.16%12.41%
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
68.45%52.65%57.57%73.40%-22.49%14.92%140.74%-15.62%58.42%5.21%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STRA:

$1.89B

LINC:

$1.27B

EPS

STRA:

$5.44

LINC:

$0.64

PE Ratio

STRA:

15.25

LINC:

63.64

PEG Ratio

STRA:

0.53

LINC:

2.24

PS Ratio

STRA:

1.52

LINC:

2.46

PB Ratio

STRA:

1.15

LINC:

6.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

STRA:

$1.27B

LINC:

$518.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

STRA:

-$445.93M

LINC:

$293.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

STRA:

$213.82M

LINC:

$45.58M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRA achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly lower than LINC's 68.45% return. Over the past 10 years, STRA has underperformed LINC with an annualized return of 7.69%, while LINC has yielded a comparatively higher 32.28% annualized return.


STRA

1D
0.59%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.20%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
0.07%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
7.69%

LINC

1D
1.22%
1M
12.25%
YTD
68.45%
6M
73.11%
1Y
156.33%
3Y*
92.98%
5Y*
44.40%
10Y*
32.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRA vs. LINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRA
STRA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
STRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
STRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRA Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

LINC
LINC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRA vs. LINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STRALINCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

3.43

-3.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.28

3.66

-3.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.51

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

5.81

-5.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.03

16.25

-16.28

STRA vs. LINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the LINC Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRA and LINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STRALINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

3.43

-3.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.03

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.56

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.07

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between STRA and LINC is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

STRA vs. LINC - Dividend Comparison

STRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
STRA
Strategic Education, Inc.
2.89%2.99%2.57%2.60%3.06%4.15%2.52%1.32%1.32%1.12%
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

STRA vs. LINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRA drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, smaller than the maximum LINC drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRA and LINC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


STRALINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.50%

-99.11%

+13.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.93%

-27.35%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.97%

-41.96%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.86%

-57.51%

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.62%

-2.24%

-53.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-59.58%

+20.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.03%

9.78%

+1.25%

Volatility

STRA vs. LINC - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) have volatilities of 10.18% and 10.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


STRALINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

10.68%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.56%

33.57%

-10.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.23%

45.82%

-15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

43.25%

-9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.81%

57.35%

-20.54%

Financials

STRA vs. LINC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategic Education, Inc. and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
323.21M
142.87M
(STRA) Total Revenue
(LINC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items