STHH vs. IVRS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return while IVRS tracks the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STHH returned 121.68% vs -8.60% for IVRS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IVRS.

Performance

STHH vs. IVRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 172.11% return, which is significantly higher than IVRS's -6.91% return.

STHH

• 1D: -3.96%
• 1M: -9.60%
• 6M: 147.27%
• YTD: 172.11%
• 1Y: 121.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVRS

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: -12.69%
• YTD: -6.91%
• 1Y: -8.60%
• 3Y*: 6.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STHH vs. IVRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	172.11%	17.60%
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	-6.91%	18.10%

Correlation

The correlation between STHH and IVRS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

STHH vs. IVRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 78
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 59

IVRS

IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 6
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STHH vs. IVRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STHH	IVRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	-0.37	+2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	-0.37	+3.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.96	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	-0.27	+3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	-0.54	+8.62

STHH vs. IVRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STHH Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the IVRS Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STHH and IVRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STHH vs. IVRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than IVRS's maximum drawdown of -31.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and IVRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	STHH	IVRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-31.43%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.89%	-31.43%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.10%	-19.92%	+6.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-6.26%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.11%	16.00%	-0.89%

Volatility

STHH vs. IVRS - Volatility Comparison

STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a higher volatility of 21.29% compared to iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) at 6.73%. This indicates that STHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STHH	IVRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.29%	6.73%	+14.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.56%	20.01%	+22.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.89%	23.16%	+30.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.97%	20.73%	+31.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.97%	20.73%	+31.24%

STHH vs. IVRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IVRS's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

STHH vs. IVRS - Dividend Comparison

STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IVRS's 8.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	8.60%	7.88%	6.65%	0.48%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.74%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STHH and IVRS in my portfolio?

STHH and IVRS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STHH or IVRS?

STHH has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to IVRS (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STHH dropped -33.89% vs IVRS's -31.43%.

Which ETF is better, STHH or IVRS?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 121.68% vs -8.60% for IVRS. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STHH or IVRS?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 121.68% return vs -8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STHH or IVRS?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STHH or IVRS?

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.60%, compared with 0.74% for STHH.

What is the main difference between STHH and IVRS?

STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.47% for IVRS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.