STHH vs. XLK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, STHH returned 115.16% vs 37.14% for XLK. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

STHH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 108.31% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 22.09% return.

STHH

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -22.86%
• 6M: 95.26%
• YTD: 108.31%
• 1Y: 115.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 102.44%

XLK

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.90%
• 6M: 22.17%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 18.87%
• 10Y*: 23.77%
• ALL TIME*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	$187.95K	$364.56K	$515.16K
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.61B	$1.67B	$2.22B

STHH vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	108.31%	17.60%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	22.09%	50.28%

Correlation

The correlation between STHH and XLK is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.68

The correlation between STHH and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

STHH vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 80
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 55
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STHH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STHH	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.34	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	1.85	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.23	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	2.16	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	5.85	+3.77

STHH vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STHH and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STHH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -37.98%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	STHH	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.98%	-82.05%	+44.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.98%	-15.92%	-22.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.48%	-11.43%	-22.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-34.80%	+23.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.47%	5.86%	+5.61%

Volatility

STHH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a higher volatility of 26.97% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 9.58%. This indicates that STHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STHH	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.97%	9.58%	+17.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.55%	21.81%	+26.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.49%	25.59%	+30.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.17%	25.75%	+29.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.17%	24.90%	+30.27%

STHH vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

STHH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.97%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.45%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STHH and XLK in my portfolio?

STHH and XLK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STHH or XLK?

STHH has higher volatility (26.97%) compared to XLK (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STHH dropped -37.98% vs XLK's -82.05%.

Which ETF is better, STHH or XLK?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 115.16% vs 37.14% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 9.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STHH or XLK?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 115.16% return vs 37.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STHH or XLK?

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for STHH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STHH or XLK?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.

What is the main difference between STHH and XLK?

STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.08% for XLK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.