STHH vs. BCTK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. STHH is passively managed, while BCTK is actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCTK.

Performance

STHH vs. BCTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 108.31% return, which is significantly higher than BCTK's 12.33% return.

STHH

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -22.86%
• 6M: 95.26%
• YTD: 108.31%
• 1Y: 115.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 102.44%

BCTK

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -7.64%
• 6M: 13.55%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	$575.68K	$431.57K	$642.86K
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	$187.95K	$364.56K	$515.16K

STHH vs. BCTK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	108.31%	0.03%
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	12.33%	0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between STHH and BCTK is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

STHH vs. BCTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 80
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 77

BCTK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STHH vs. BCTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STHH	BCTK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	—	—

Drawdowns

STHH vs. BCTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -37.98%, which is greater than BCTK's maximum drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and BCTK.

Drawdown Indicators

	STHH	BCTK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.98%	-18.63%	-19.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.48%	-13.13%	-20.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-4.08%	-6.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STHH	BCTK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.49%	31.80%	+24.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.17%	31.80%	+23.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.17%	31.80%	+23.37%

STHH vs. BCTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BCTK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

STHH vs. BCTK - Dividend Comparison

STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.97%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STHH and BCTK in my portfolio?

STHH and BCTK have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, STHH or BCTK?

On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STHH or BCTK?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STHH or BCTK?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.

What is the main difference between STHH and BCTK?

They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Baron Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.75% for BCTK.