STHH vs. BCTK
STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. STHH is passively managed, while BCTK is actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCTK.
Performance
STHH vs. BCTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 208.14% return, which is significantly higher than BCTK's 28.43% return.
STHH
- 1D
- 15.17%
- 1M
- 43.33%
- YTD
- 208.14%
- 6M
- 229.02%
- 1Y
- 217.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCTK
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 16.79%
- YTD
- 28.43%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH vs. BCTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 208.14% | -1.72% |
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 28.43% | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between STHH and BCTK is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STHH vs. BCTK — Risk / Return Rank
STHH
BCTK
STHH vs. BCTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STHH | BCTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.35 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.29 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.36 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STHH | BCTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.43 | 2.97 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
STHH vs. BCTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than BCTK's maximum drawdown of -13.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and BCTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STHH | BCTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -13.96% | -19.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -3.02% | -7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.90% | — | — |
Volatility
STHH vs. BCTK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STHH | BCTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.41% | 27.06% | +23.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.52% | 27.06% | +22.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.52% | 27.06% | +22.46% |
STHH vs. BCTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BCTK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
STHH vs. BCTK - Dividend Comparison
STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.55% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STHH and BCTK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Baron Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.75% for BCTK.
Find the right allocation for STHH and BCTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer