SSXU vs. BAM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SSXU (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Day Hagan, while BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SSXU returned 12.85%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for BAM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SSXU vs. BAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSXU achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly higher than BAM's -11.82% return.

SSXU

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 5.10%
• 6M: 7.19%
• 1Y: 18.49%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAM

• 1D: -5.24%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: -11.82%
• 6M: -12.95%
• 1Y: -16.86%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSXU vs. BAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF	5.10%	27.09%	5.28%	9.56%	-2.27%
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	-11.82%	-0.24%	39.70%	45.61%	-10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SSXU and BAM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022	0.59

The correlation between SSXU and BAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSXU vs. BAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSXU

SSXU Risk / Return Rank: 38
SSXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SSXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SSXU Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SSXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SSXU Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BAM

BAM Risk / Return Rank: 18
BAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BAM Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BAM Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSXU vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSXU	BAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	-0.57	+1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	-0.63	+2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.92	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	-0.56	+2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.18	-1.03	+7.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSXU vs. BAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the BAM Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSXU and BAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSXU	BAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	-0.57	+1.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.48	+0.37

Drawdowns

SSXU vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSXU drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, smaller than the maximum BAM drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXU and BAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSXU	BAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.91%	-30.37%	+16.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-30.37%	+19.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.91%	-30.37%	+16.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.48%	-25.74%	+22.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-8.76%	+5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	16.37%	-13.37%

Volatility

SSXU vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) is 4.41%, while Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a volatility of 9.81%. This indicates that SSXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSXU	BAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	9.81%	-5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	22.33%	-10.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.61%	29.64%	-16.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	30.22%	-15.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.38%	30.22%	-15.84%

Dividends

SSXU vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison

SSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than BAM's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	4.15%	3.34%	2.80%	3.19%	0.00%
SSXU Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector International ETF	2.53%	2.66%	2.74%	2.07%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSXU and BAM in my portfolio?

SSXU and BAM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSXU or BAM?

BAM has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to SSXU (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSXU dropped -13.91% vs BAM's -30.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.