PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAM vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAM and SPY is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

BAM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
33.45%
8.43%
BAM
SPY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAM:

2.00

SPY:

2.20

Sortino Ratio

BAM:

2.54

SPY:

2.91

Omega Ratio

BAM:

1.35

SPY:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

BAM:

4.33

SPY:

3.35

Martin Ratio

BAM:

9.43

SPY:

13.99

Ulcer Index

BAM:

5.52%

SPY:

2.01%

Daily Std Dev

BAM:

26.05%

SPY:

12.79%

Max Drawdown

BAM:

-20.47%

SPY:

-55.19%

Current Drawdown

BAM:

-5.93%

SPY:

-1.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 1.96% return.


BAM

YTD

2.55%

1M

2.11%

6M

33.45%

1Y

47.40%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SPY

YTD

1.96%

1M

2.27%

6M

9.55%

1Y

27.02%

5Y*

14.23%

10Y*

13.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAM vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAM is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAM is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAM is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAM is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAM is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAM is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPY is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPY is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPY is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPY is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPY is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPY is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAM, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.002.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAM, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.542.91
The chart of Omega ratio for BAM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.351.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAM, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.333.35
The chart of Martin ratio for BAM, currently valued at 9.43, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.4313.99
BAM
SPY

The current BAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.00
2.20
BAM
SPY

Dividends

BAM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than SPY's 1.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
2.74%2.80%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%

Drawdowns

BAM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -20.47%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.93%
-1.35%
BAM
SPY

Volatility

BAM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a higher volatility of 11.66% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.10%. This indicates that BAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
11.66%
5.10%
BAM
SPY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab