PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAM vs. BIPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAM vs. BIPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BAM having a -6.95% return and BIPC slightly lower at -7.28%.


BAM

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.55%
YTD
-6.95%
6M
-6.63%
1Y
-11.72%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
10Y*

BIPC

1D
0.63%
1M
11.50%
YTD
-7.28%
6M
-8.99%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAM vs. BIPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
-6.95%-0.24%-0.82%
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
-7.28%18.32%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BAM and BIPC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAM:

$77.32B

BIPC:

$5.49B

EPS

BAM:

$1.55

BIPC:

-$6.15

PS Ratio

BAM:

15.28

BIPC:

1.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAM:

$5.08B

BIPC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAM:

$3.26B

BIPC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAM:

$2.35B

BIPC:

$2.59B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAM vs. BIPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM
BAM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BIPC
BIPC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BIPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPC Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAM vs. BIPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMBIPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

0.28

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

0.55

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.07

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

0.29

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.72

0.83

-1.55

BAM vs. BIPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the BIPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM and BIPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMBIPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.28

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.35

+0.20

Drawdowns

BAM vs. BIPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, roughly equal to the maximum BIPC drawdown of -29.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and BIPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMBIPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.37%

-29.77%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.37%

-29.77%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.64%

-17.46%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-7.75%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.29%

10.32%

+5.97%

Volatility

BAM vs. BIPC - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) at 7.06%. This indicates that BAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMBIPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

7.06%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.75%

22.49%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.18%

27.93%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.10%

29.77%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.10%

29.77%

+0.33%

Dividends

BAM vs. BIPC - Dividend Comparison

BAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than BIPC's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc.
3.94%3.34%2.80%3.19%
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
4.29%3.79%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAM vs. BIPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.34B
871.76M
(BAM) Total Revenue
(BIPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAM vs. BIPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Asset Management Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
61.0%
Portfolio components
BAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BIPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported a gross profit of 531.53M and revenue of 871.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.0%.

BAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BIPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported an operating income of 510.82M and revenue of 871.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.6%.

BAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a net income of 617.00M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.

BIPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation reported a net income of -110.45M and revenue of 871.76M, resulting in a net margin of -12.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAM and BIPC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAM has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to BIPC (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAM dropped -30.37% vs BIPC's -29.77%.

BIPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAM and BIPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer